I am having trouble with the lawgic. My take away was:

WD m→ feature art

/comfortable→/WD

comfortable→SI

My thoughts for chaining...

contrapose comfortable→SI to become /SI→/comfortable

Therefore the chain...

/SI→/comfortable→/WD

So if /WD then... /WD m→/feature art

Can someone please explain why this is incorrect?

I appreciate the help!

Admin Note: Edited title. For LR questions, please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."

0

2 comments

  • Thursday, Sep 19 2024

    You can't get the contrapositive of a most statement. The statement reads WD m--> FA. That's how it has to be read. /WD draws no conclusions anyway, it's the sufficient.

    0
  • Wednesday, Sep 18 2024

    im free rn if you want to go over it my discord is hiloiland

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?