Could we take it a step further and say that Sklar believes discouragement of carelessness, inattention, and impulsiveness has such a societal value? Or would that be taking it too far?

"that's fantastic! What do I do with this information?" is a go-to line now.

I can see what you're saying, but the rule "without permission" implies anything but permission. Yes, we don't know if the neighbor gave him permission or not but permission was never granted, the "without permission" has been satisfied.

How does it not complete the application? Am I making unnecessary assumptions?

People in Maine need to stop consuming margarine.

I love second-guessing myself in the blind review.

This lesson made me realize why the hearsay objection is relevant.

going over C

J.Y. : " Oh yes this is good."

Me: I agree completely, C is great.

J.Y. : Just kidding it was a trap :)

Me: Of course C is terrible I agree.

In all fairness, dolphins are evil themselves.