- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Did anyone actually feel good about the virus game? I sure didn't - just wanted to see if anyone thought it was manageable.
@ That makes complete sense - thank you for your explanation. I hope that it's both in our favors!!
@ Really hoping for a forgiving curve given that ridiculous virus game
Isn't the LSAT not curved? Please forgive me if I've wrong! LSAC's methods have always mystified me.
Sure @, here's one video: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-36-section-1-question-18/ I've had trouble with. I've also clicked on a bunch of random videos, and all of them had the same buffering problem. I tried defaulting to flash for a little bit, but the flash player also buffers for me. YouTube videos work fine. Thanks again for your help!
Hey Dillon thanks for replying! Unfortunately, clearing the cache did not work for me. My Internet connection appears to be fine for all other websites, including this one (besides the video player).
I'm on a mac, and I am having video buffering problems as well. I use Chrome, but I also experienced this problem on Safari when I tried to play videos there. So far, I have not been able to solve this.
I'm still a bit confused by this question. Couldn't the system of regulations continue to expand in response to changes that they were aware were coming? In my view, it can still expand without complaints. Please help me see where I am going wrong.
Also having trouble with answer choice E. One part of the argument's conclusion is that "mild sleep deprivation is not unhealthy". So wouldn't other, unconsidered negative consequences point to the fact that sleep deprivation is in fact healthy?
I'm a little bit confused by answer choice E. Doesn't "ignoble" mean "not noble", which then negates the necessary condition of nobility and then negates the sufficient condition of tragedy? In that case, I don't see how answer choice E's conclusion that it is not a tragedy is wrong.
In #8, I don't understand why A is the answer. The passages say that they both teach, and I don't see how you can assume that they are active members of these professions based on the fact that they teach.
Do you think they would change the format of the test itself at all?