Hey folks! Looking for study buddies in Vancouver area! Aiming deadline for January 2024.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
uhm... this one LOL forgot to keep in mind 'EXCEPT'!!!
A-ok, this one seems to provide support on why it's dangerous
B-also conveys the idea that something about 'fish' wasn't so healthy. It seems like a support to the argument, dont make the same mistake because we're looking for weakening statement
C- this too, tells something not so healthy in the recommendation from 'vegetables and fruits'
D-okay, says that 'fruits and vegetables provide vitamins. My only assumption is: okay, since it got vitamins isn't supposed to be healthy, if it is health it must be not dangerous then? Then this potentially weakens the argument
E-okay, so eating this much ... is enough aka 'sufficient' to be healthy but you gotta eat it so it makes up for your unhealthy foods (in this example it is 'sweets and fats', I just assume they are unhealthy in this concept). I also imagined the example, when I got to McDonald's and I get french fries, I then promise myself to eat the next snack or meal that's healthy. Seems like it supports the dangerousness of the recommendation because a good diet will not promote something like this.
Hey, I need advice. How important is it to follow the order of syllabus? and how tangible the lessons are between one other? For example, I wanted to start with reading comprehension instead of the logic games because reading comprehension is my weakness
Hi guys! Planning to take in November!
#help
Hi folks, I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong when reviewing the video explanations to the drills. So, once I finish my blind review, and review my answers, and then I follow the video explanations, but then every time when I need to go back to that drill, I have to go back to all the way to the main menu. Is that the case with the rest of the people?
Hi Folks, I also have question:
I've just began studying for the LSAT. I've taken a few practice tests, and released the spots that is my weakness. Now, should I follow syllabus, or can I go to reading comprehension first, then back to logical reasoning lessons? Here is what I'm trying to understand, how tangible the sections are between one another?