Why should we assume the actor doesn't have a script with him? Actors more often than not have a full-script of the play. It's quite a big assumption to make that they don't

This is not a good lesson at all. 7sage either you review this or you will be losing customers like myself. Instead of listing all the wrong parts you should list the correct ways. The titles are also very confusing. I've never seen someone summarizing the wrong things of something. Summarize what is correct so someone can remember the good parts.

Also, you have videos on grammar and not the MOST important things like this? This is where you should have videos, not useless grammar on nouns and verbs.

I've had 7sage for a few days now and all I can say is it's wasting my money and time.

Great lesson

what happened to the rule application flaw questions and the flaw argument weakening questions? we had a few lessons on them but they're not listed on this table?

Isn't this assuming outside information? Why should I assume there's more small studies than bigger ones? It could be the opposite in the LSAT world

I'm a little confused on why A wouldn't be relevant. It says the volcano would sink on Earth. Wouldn't that mean that there is erosion? "The forces" are dragging the volcano down (sinking it in this case)

what the ??