I am sure it is somewhere in the CC; but does anyone know where I can find the list of words that introduce a Premise or a conclusion? Words like so or therefore? Do we have a list?
Thank you!
I am sure it is somewhere in the CC; but does anyone know where I can find the list of words that introduce a Premise or a conclusion? Words like so or therefore? Do we have a list?
Thank you!
I chose B, and don't laugh, cos "not significantly less expensive, negate the negative from both sides (not and less), so it becomes significantly expensive. Ergo Narrow is expensive so that supports.
THE question says "The Claim that the...", the question tells us that it is a claim, lol!!!1
I chose B cos I assumed they eat their own parasites, cos AC B says "feeds on smaller organisms". And then I started assuming that if it feeds on its own parasites, it must be the case.
Why is D the right answer? If Cod is feeding on Capelin (that seals east) then how is it explaining that the Seals are thriving?
I have gone through all the books out there. The bibles, Manhattan prep, Cassidy, someone on tikTok recommended something... I legit went through them all but nothing makes sense like 7Sage.
This platform is legit, and it also makes sense like I am learning these concepts on the same machine I will use to take the test! The commentary by JY is enlightening. The discussion posts are on point. And the AI behind this thing is insane!
thank you everyone at 7Sage. This platform is worth every penny.
TBH, this question will be CANCELLED in today's society where we can't assume people's gender. Here we have to assume that women don't read ESPN.
Hi, I am blind and I have been approved for 151% additional time; however, when I take the practice test here, the only option is between 50% additional, 100% additional, and 1XX% additional time but not 151%.
It would mean a lot if you could perhaps give that option or add an option where students can add custom time they wanna take to finish a set.
To prove my request, I can also email the accommodations letter issued from LSAC.
Please advise
Who here stopped reading D after good working conditions?
#help (Added by Admin)
I am laughing at myself for getting this wrong.
This Q was easy cos the wrong AC were easy.
I wasn't even born when this question was written so I got it wrong. I thought they were obligated.
A ---> B --SOME--> C; therefore A ----> C, is that a valid argument?
I know A ---Some--> C is an invalid argument, but I am unsure about the not some situation.
This question drained my time and soul.
I am hungry now. Love me some Indian food.
This was some stupid question. I was born in the year this question was asked, and I am asking myself what is a police lineup?
#help (Added by Admin)
Although I got this AC right, I think as this is a really old test and the English words are so convoluted that it doesn't make sense; I hope on the recent LSAT, they don't use two words for one thing
TBH, if there was a time crunch and AC D was the first option, I would've chosen it and moved on.
So I did it the following way:
Premise TV --rise---> MusicVideos ----> ArtForm
Conclusion: TV --rise--> ArtForm
AC B was the only one that was able to mirror that
Why isn't "FIGHK" possible? I think the answer should be C instead of E, help, I am loosing it...
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# (G#) - brief description of question"
This was the easiest question I have ever seen. OR maybe I am just too much into art.
It was the freeing plural that threw me off, but JY is right, there are multiple explanations!!!
Thank you everyone for your warm words of welcome.
Yes, I work full time with hours ranging from 40-60 hours/week. And my spouse, who is now paralyzed, requires therapy for which I spend additional 5-8 hours/week to take them to the hospital and other complications.
In other words, I thought about LSAT all the time, and whenever I found time I would either practice a game or look at previous answers I got wrong (I have a word/excel document with all my answers that I got wrong, and I would go through them whenever I found time).
The test is totally doable and I was able to do it in 4 months! Finding patterns is very important and keeping an open mind, calm mind, will help you reach your goal.
For those saying I am smart, trust me I am not. I never excelled in school (uGPA:3.7) and I make silly mistakes all the time.
Glad I could help. A lot of you have reached out to me directly, I am more than happy to answer any question, if you are not comfortable sharing it publicly.
Remember, LSAT is a test, waiting for us to dominate it. It’s learnable and patterns are clear.
For me it all started after the Core Curriculum. It took me about 7-8 weeks to go through CC, and then I took like 5 PTs to find what I am doing. I didn't do anything for RC on CC initially, just LR and LG.
After the 5th PT, my LG was basically -0 and LR was ranging from -3 to -12, and then I worked on what type of questions in LR I got wrong.
For RC, it was very important for me to bring some sense of real world experience into it. Like initially I was going through passages and I would just read them to make sure I answer the question, but once I started to read them to actually comprehend, the answers became easy. RC is just long LR.
Also for RC, I usually know the first passage is about intro and the later passages are mostly about questioning the first paragraph or sometimes supporting it. Idk if I am making sense here, but you gotta work and go through the PTs, and discover patterns.
In all, it took me about 4 months to go from 130s to 174. Good luck, the test is totally open for us to dominate it, don't dither and be a good master to control it. LSAT is a good sub.
And tbh trusting the process was very important. Even during my January test, there were tech issues, the proctor was such a nuisance but I made sure that didn't affect my process.
I also meditate! I practice Sudarshan Kriya (a type of meditation) by the Art of Living Foundation, you can find it online how to do it for free.
In other words, LG will click possibly after repeating them. I did LG games for fun between breaks at work ( I work full time, and my spouse was in an accident and now uses a wheelchair and requires help full time, so I also have family obligations and time commitments).
For LR, finding what's your achilles heal is important. For me parallel flaw questions were the worst. It took me a while to get use to them.
For RC, it is very important to read between the lines and keep an open mind.
I am just glad I found 7Sage. Practicing on the same computer where I took the test gave me a sense of comfort. 7Sage is way better than any book you can purchase because it makes total sense to learn about the test on the same laptop you will possibly take your actual test.
If you guys have any other question, lmk I will be happy to give back.
I want to express a deep sense of thanks to 7Sage for helping me get to a 174! I took the LSAT twice, the first time I received a 138, and right after that I found 7Sage! I am deeply indebted to everyone here, including my fellow 7Sagers who would comment and share their ideas via posts that helped me immensely.
I have learnt a lot and the Core Curriculum is so well designed!
Thank you everyone! And good luck on your LSAT journey.
Hi, I am approved for my accommodations, and it is my understanding that the most time you can get is 100% extra time but, going through practice test I see an option for 186% time? Is it possible to get accommodations for 186%? or is 100% extra time the most LSAC can provide?
I have MS and am blind.
I said it in the last question, I am saying it again. If two answer choices have similar wording, one of them is bound to be correct.
Admin Note: removed all caps
From my limited experience, what I have noticed is that if two AC have similar language; one of them is correct. In this AC A and AC D start with " a large proportion of mail"; so I was sure one of them is the right answer.
Novels are books!!!