took me three minutes to get it right.... was it worth it? lmao

this is a 2 minute question frfr

the premise 'using peat moss unsustainably' does not at all necessarily equal 'significantly reducing oxygen going into the atmosphere'. this question is deeply flawed imho

my fluctuation is awful. in my last 8 PTs i've gone from 163 to 175 and all the way back to 160. The test is cruel. Burnout is real.

congrats!!! now don't get complacent like i did LOL

everything in moderation. especially politics. I like to watch Democracy Now with Amy Goodman. Recently found it, and it covers world and US politics daily for no longer than ~15 min. ww.youtube.com/user/democracynow

lilpingling, you don't need to be in your home. Considering what you've said, I very much hope you are not.

this was god awful

this is a classic example of 5 bad answers, 4 very bad answers

BAN DOGS

Question is BS. haven't seen logic from LSAC this mediocre since the 90s. B is an awful answer bc it's entirely possible that this people from 10,000 BC do not eat any plants that no one else eats. Eating a wider variety of plants =/= using some individual plants in ways that no one else did.

I'm interested. I"ll be taking January retake.

Pinyon nuts are pine nuts

ayyyy where my E people at... :,(

question ten is annoying. requires specific knowledge of law imo.

NSA >:0