I know the option for "incorrect when last taken" is available in the auto drilling mode, but please add it in the custom drilling mode as well. It would be great to choose a specific set of question types, from a specific range of tests, then drill ones I got wrong. Currently, there is no way to accomplish this task efficiently with either the main drilling choices or custom choices.
I agree. 7Sage's explanation for 13 is not very helpful or detailed for the most difficult question of the set.
I am not disagreeing that it would be a singular farm. But where are we told that one farm cannot have multiple CMCs?
#5 D threw me off because I did not read anywhere that farmers must only have one CMC. What if a farmer has two CMS’s and one CMC requests 5 crops and another CMC requests 5 more? #help
Please give us the option to see which answers we eliminated/crossed out when looking at our preptest answer results. This would help us see our original thought processing when blind reviewing and when going over final results.
7Sage needs to get a LawHub test result import feature. Another site I use, adeptLR, seems to be a much smaller company than 7Sage and they have that feature. Maybe 7Sage already has that, but I am missing where to find it. If someone knows please let me know. I want to take my PT's on LawHub so it fully mimics the real LSAT, but it is such a pain to have to manually import all answers to utilize analytics on 7Sage.
It would be nice to decide which pretests exactly you can choose from with the auto feature as opposed to having to manually decide more recent tests.
Thank you. It looks like it automatically chooses to drill from the oldest to newest. If there can be a way to filter the tool to drill from missed questions from a chosen set of PT's that would be helpful.
In my case I want to drill only more recent missed questions, and no easy way to do that with this feature the way it is now.
When using auto drilling, is there a way to ensure it does not repeat previously drilled questions?
For instance, if you choose to drill 10 random LR questions that you got wrong in all your PTs, then you finish that, if you do another set of 10 random, will it be sure to not repeat any of the previous 10?
JY seems to present many PSA labeled questions as principle.
where can I find a lesson on the difference between these two question types?
Is there a way to filter my analytics priority type questions, such as NA type, and filter out all the ones missed in LR and create a problem set to drill those questions?
Isn't the contrapositive of JY's map D? #help (Added by Admin)
Yes, but let's say that a larger house is only slightly larger than a smaller house. The difference with "significant" price is also subjective. Narrow boards could still be cheaper.
Consider it takes 80 of the $1.00 wide floor boards to cover a small house. $80
Then say the narrow boards cost $.70. Significantly cheaper or just cheaper? - you decide.
It takes 100 of these narrow boards to cover a house just slightly larger than the small house. It does not specify how much more narrow the boards actually are.
In this case the "wealthy" person is actually being the cheap ass only spending $70.
incorrect. for B: They said that narrow boards are not "significantly less expensive" which means they could still be moderately less expensive, slightly less expensive, the same price, or more expensive the way this answer is written.
Terribly worded question. We are required to make a lot of assumptions based on B. Let's say they are not "super less expensive" but are still "less expensive", then that is a stretch to say we can conclude it is a status symbol to buy the cheaper boards. Hopefully they don't write them like this anymore.
I got this right, but was hesitant because of "at least a few" versus "several", are we supposed to assume that these are the same? Does at least a few mean at least one? I think I remember a lesson on that in which LSAT considers a "few" different than we typically would. Can anyone confirm?
Thanks
#help (Added by Admin)