User Avatar
roge0644852
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
roge0644852
Sunday, Jun 23 2024

She would merengue

1
PrepTests ·
PT133.S3.Q26
User Avatar
roge0644852
Thursday, Jun 20 2024

I think (I have no clue! Just a guess bcs I got this wrong too haha) the reason that this question is so tricky is because it requires you to think about the other group that wasn't mentioned instead of the group that was. If the 52% doesn't move, then the 48% doesn't move because the whole is always 100%. I chose E because I was considering the wrong subset. But it's a much stronger argument to say that the people who vote are just dogmatically blinded by their support than to say that he was able to explain it away successfully, because we don't have enough context to know. With the context we're given, we can infer that there is som illogical, unswayable allegiance.

1
User Avatar
roge0644852
Wednesday, May 15 2024

I think it's because there is no relationship between the two statements. They both just facts about the scenario.

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?