Is this not necessary assumption? Idk

4 is absolutely nuts

Was no one else stuck on C? I chose A correctly, but was surprised to see such a strong A breakup. I probably spent the most time on this question. Weird...

real

no fr I had the same problem. It just said they wanted more interest, don't see why literal kings of all people would have difficulties paying that interest. Got the rest of the section right but even after the explanation this still doesn't make clear sense to me, though I guess its better than the other choices

Is this not a really weak Answer Choice? I got it right because there was, quite literally, nothing else that moderately even came close to answering the argument. But how do we know that whenever possible means having comparable privacy to private rooms? Any idea on how to approach vague questions like these??

Fair play, got me on this one.

Am I missing something? Assuming you have 1000 Etching Tools in the World. 300 PT, 700 Bladed. Out of those 700 Bladed, 350 are Etching and 350 are not etching. Then the conclusion would still stand (#OF ET > # OF NON ET), even though there doesn't need to be as many PT ET's compared to Blading ET's. What am I missing over here? Was there any sort of assumption that needed to be made stating that both had to be roughly equal? Would appreciate anyone following up to this!!

This was so easy I almost thought it was a trap and read through all the answer choices again LOL

There is no way its AC C

Was stuck between C and D for the longest time thought about it and chose right.

I have no idea what this questions means

I got it right pretty fast but tbh it was more dependent on POE than anything else. Feel like its a lot easier to get things right on the LSAT by cutting down answers than anything else

i just got rid of B because I thought it was circular reasoning, in any case A seemed pretty on the nose

This is a one star question bud I think you are overthinking it a tad. Use Occam's Razor for the first 6

It's not hard to perceive, for an ad to be effective it has to convince someone to buy something they didn't already intend on buying, which AC B shows.

Took me like 7 minutes on this before I took B smh

What is the phone is on speaker?

got it right but went way over time, got to do more conditional logic reviews

That was great, A was pretty cookie cutter for me but thought D was kind of strong too, the "people" argument you made definitely helped me rule that out a bit, thanks.

Boy the language in this is nuts

you have to do a double take on it because it's worded in such a convoluted manner, that being said the argument once restructured into simple english is relatively straightforward!

Easy

ez

It's not that deep you just get rid of D because D says "could" but the premise says "would"; I think everybody overthinks the LSAT to some extent