got it right but went way over time, got to do more conditional logic reviews
Was no one else stuck on C? I chose A correctly, but was surprised to see such a strong A breakup. I probably spent the most time on this question. Weird...
you have to do a double take on it because it's worded in such a convoluted manner, that being said the argument once restructured into simple english is relatively straightforward!
This was so easy I almost thought it was a trap and read through all the answer choices again LOL
Was stuck between C and D for the longest time thought about it and chose right.
Good explanation video, I like it when you go in depth explaining these 50/50s. I chose A and got it right, but came to see the explanation video after it to refine my thinking. Thanks!
Got it right but took me a hot minute unfortunately. Hope to slow down before April.
This whole question was nuts, just chose B and went with it
I don't think this was very clear when doing it; the only way I got it right was by negating it (if you negate Choice D, the argument falls apart). For NA questions I feel like negating it is a better choice than anything else
Been using it to draw LG Diagrams. I'm registered for April, so if I can't use it, better to know sooner than later so I can amend my approach. Not a huge deal imo, but it helps keeps the diagrams a bit cleaner, would probably be 1 minute slower overall without it. Thanks and let me know.
I got it right pretty fast but tbh it was more dependent on POE than anything else. Feel like its a lot easier to get things right on the LSAT by cutting down answers than anything else
i just got rid of B because I thought it was circular reasoning, in any case A seemed pretty on the nose
Is this not a really weak Answer Choice? I got it right because there was, quite literally, nothing else that moderately even came close to answering the argument. But how do we know that whenever possible means having comparable privacy to private rooms? Any idea on how to approach vague questions like these??
Am I missing something? Assuming you have 1000 Etching Tools in the World. 300 PT, 700 Bladed. Out of those 700 Bladed, 350 are Etching and 350 are not etching. Then the conclusion would still stand (#OF ET > # OF NON ET), even though there doesn't need to be as many PT ET's compared to Blading ET's. What am I missing over here? Was there any sort of assumption that needed to be made stating that both had to be roughly equal? Would appreciate anyone following up to this!!
Took me like 7 minutes on this before I took B smh
I have no idea what this questions means
Is this not necessary assumption? Idk