Thank you. I completed PT 91 and 92 on LawHub over the weekend.

I don't remember any of those games. Do you know which PTs those are?

There's a PT92? I only see up to PT90 available on 7Sage Preptests

Thanks for the recommendation. I tried PT9 S3 G3. It was a similar game to the October LSAT. But definitely easier. I think the easier difficulty on the PT9 game is because the questions gave you additional premises which kicked in various rules / inferences.

On the October LSAT game, the last 3 questions didn't kick in rules / inferences as easily. I forget whether those questions gave additional premises or not.

Can anyone recommend other similar miscellaneous style games like these? Thank you

Can someone help me with 13? I picked A initially but overthought about the "origins" wording. Because we talked about not only the origins but also the evolution & current situation, I figured it wasn't a better choice than A.

And I picked C since the 2 scholars were Milman & Adam Parry and the passage talked about both in great detail.

#help

Does anyone know if it's possible to set alerts for ProctorU if a preferred time slot opens up? Example: "send an email if a time slot between 1-3pm on Sunday becomes available?"

I scheduled about half an hour ago but my preferred time slot / day was unavailable

I picked D instead of C. I thought the question was asking about explaining "why all cultures have the same ancient narratives." But its actually about resolving "why study various folktales if they all have the same narratives"

Unfortunate mistake but sometimes happens

For 26E, I interpreted the "general type of theory" as Social Darwinism. And therefore the passage is Gilman's "version of that theory (Social Darwinism)."

Can someone explain why that's still wrong? Thank you.

#help

I took my test on the 10th. I had LG - RC - RC - LR

The LG was going well until the last game with the musicians/duets. I had ~12-14 minutes left but it still wrecked me. The last 3 questions were mostly random guesses.

My first RC was Mali government, evolutionary theory of humans, Alice Munro comparative, and paternalism of law.

The second RC was (1) something about human mind & computers, (2) privacy and regulation, (3) Babylon Hanging Gardens, and (4) Frederick Douglass comparative.

The second RC felt slightly easier than the first. But each one had some questions I struggled on.

My last section was LR but I don't remember much about it. I don't remember whether it was 25 or 26 questions. The only question I remember was one near the end about a superconductor (I think?).

Haha this definitely tricked me. But the bright side is I was so convinced by the trap that I spent only a minute on this question. The worst case scenario is spending 2, 3, or 4 minutes on a question just to get it wrong anyways.

#smallvictories

Haha I misread this as "agree" not "disagree." Always sucks to give up points due to silly mistakes.

I'm not a stats major but I had the same thought! "Are we sure the survey in D didn't use different people than the survey in the stimulus?" Thought it was a trap AC so I went with C haha.

#help

Can someone explain why the logic is RAC -> IMI and not IMI -> RAC as I initially read it? I watched the explanation a couple times but don't understand how he diagrammed the logic that way.

thank you