We back babyyyyy

If love here refers to a feeling, then this promise makes no sense, got the A when I had dollars and the R when I had cents

SA is beating my butt

Too many PT's. Take a break.

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

from Imgflip Meme Generator

#25 is ass. The passage states the ozone concentrations should stay the same if not impacted by pollutants. Natural production+ destruction of gas= equilibrium.

Fairly certain you need a complete application to be considered for ED. If you were planning to use a future LSAT, in this case January, ED would not be available for any of the schools that offer it from what I've seen. Basically if you want to ED, they would use the LSAT score from prior to their deadline so the application is considered complete, or else your application is just an RD submission if planning to use a future LSAT, post ED deadline.

It sounds like you'll have to weigh the benefits of an ED application with the November score vs. the potential for a better score later, but also a later RD application.

This question is big bad. I still believe C is correct. By definition, you can certainly 'care' (feel concern or interest; attach importance to something) without being 'concerned' (worried, troubled, or anxious) with it. If the leaders are not concerned with the productivity, as it stands, it supports their choice to implement a new system while retaining their current methods of operation.

Answer choice A states the new system will not increase the efficiency to any appreciable degree. Appreciable is defined as capable of being perceived or measured. The system can increase efficiency to an appreciable degree without significantly increasing efficiency. I think LSAT is wrong af this time and C is right. #help #senseiJY

Great thread! Bumping for my 01/24 testers.

You don't need to use the curriculum to guide your PTs. Just develop an approach to taking them when you feel like testing your progress. I'm pretty sure the V1 just unnecessarily tossed in a lot of PT's at the end of the syllabus, but from everything I've gathered it seems best to stick to 1-2 PTs a week on the high end.

Absolutely email every school you want to attend and provide reasoning along with your LSAC # and often they will provide a waiver. Keep in mind, the CAS fee will typically still be required, but it still saves the bulk of the costs.

Try to appeal the fee waiver if you have supportive reasoning. Sometimes it will auto-deny based on things like savings amount, etc. Just provide further reasoning if you feel it should be granted. If it is, then LawHub will be included along with other perks.

Urine is