On the actual LSAT, it might be more time conscious if you mentally associate an idea with a highlighter color, bold, or underlined. Rather than writing down a few words, it can save so much time and it's helped me trigger my brain to better recall my summary!

Can you not say desiring "it" could be referring to loosing of the wind? Does it always have to refer to just a noun? Im confused on why it's not plausible to substitute it with the word loosing as well as wind.

How come on question 3, the sentence begins with The only, but it is not used as a necessary condition?

How do you know which one is the subset and which is the superset? For example the "If one is a turtle, then one is a ninja." How would you know to make the ninja the superset?

I think the difference is that conditional depend on one another, and consequence result from another. Conditional clauses ( sometimes if or unless), set a condition that must be met for the main clause to be true. Ex) If it rains, the picnic will be ruined. Consequences describe outcomes. Ex) The picnic is scheduled indoors so that it won't be canceled in case of rain.

Thank you so much!

On the LSAT, if it asks you to pick the choice that weakens the argument most, does it have to be true and realistic? Or just weaken the argument? For example: If an answer choice for the tiger argument is "Tiger's are not mammals" that weakens the argument most but it's not true. Would that still be the right answer?