Self-study
scamplejohn
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
scamplejohn
Sunday, Feb 23, 2025
I'm not sure if I remember it being discussed in 7sage material, but I know that this is true because of a Logic class I took.
Yoda is an animal but Luke is a person.
If you take this sentence and break down the clauses (Yoda is an animal) and (Luke is a person), there is no "relationship" per se between the two of them. Not a disjunction, not a conditional, not a biconditional, all that makes sense is a conjunction relationship. In Logic, the sentence can be translated as Yoda is an animal and Luke is a person.
I get, for the most part, why C is wrong (what I initially picked before blind review) and I get why D is the MBT answer, however I don't quite understand how to catch that sort of mistake in the future, For lack of a better explanation, this use of the "double most". Any tips?