Anyone have any advice on how to close the gap between those two scores by November? Logic Games is the quickest to improve on. I have only done about 10% of the curriculum. Would it be better to jump right into practice tests or to finish the curriculum?
I did not like this question because I felt that neither A nor E weaken the argument that much. Sure JY's explanation makes total sense. However, I would argue that we might expect that if an animal is another animal's most dangerous predator, then they are posing the highest risk to that animal. Meaning if any animal is going to kill it, then it will be the most dangerous predator. And if these predators are unable to climb trees, well then nothing is going to kill that flying bird. Again, I see why A is right, but I am surprised at how weak the connection is.
A was such a good trap and I didn't see it coming at such an early question..
So I totally see why Question 10 is D. But does anyone else feel like the explanation for B being wrong is a little weak? I read B and circled it and moved on to save time during my timed practiced.
So I got #5 wrong because I had no idea how to pronounce "dang-tang." Because of this, I assumed that "dang" meant "down" and "tang" meant "town." So I selected answer choice B. I am surprised that the pronunciation of a foreign term is the key to this question...
And making the example in the text a word that incorporates the "local experience" only makes it worse.
For Question 17, JY state that having no consensus is necessary for Clinical Equipoise. I don't see how this inference is made from "The very absence of consensus within the clinical community is what makes clinical equipoise possible. Why does what makes it "possible" make it necessary?
Re-posting user apublicdisplay's question because I think we could use a better explanation for this:
---------- "Wait, just because those who claim that handwriting analysis provides reliable evidence are irresponsible doesn’t mean all handwriting analysts are irresponsible. What if we have an analyst who just doesn’t make the claim that handwriting analysis is reliable? Could he not be a responsible analyst? I don’t see how (D) proves that no responsible handwriting analyst exists."
Completely missed that A was talking about the wrong ASIA. Damn you LSAT!