Exactly what the title says. If you fit the description, comment below and lets start talking details.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Idk... Coming from a finance background, distribution costs will still be accounted for it would just be 0. But I can see why D is more correct.
I did. I knew C was not it because it said strictly agriculture. A was the only answer that didn't suck.
the wording of C was very confusing to me so I kind of ignored it because I'm like nah what are the chances its this one... lol
Its a valid solution in dealing with CO2. I do not think it is absurd. Most of the oxygen comes from the plankton in the bottom of the ocean so actually not far off.... could be that because CO2 is trapped there the most that the plankton thrive down there... not relevant but food for thought.
Somehow we have to make a huge assumption for E to be right but assuming in regards to AC B that sleepy teenagers are tardy because of the accidents is too much of an assumption to make.... what a joke of a question...
Just gotta assume the last 5 questions of this section are meant to trick you. That assumption marginally improved my performance.
I knew it was E because none of the other AC made sense but I did not know what presuppositions meant so spent longer than necessary on this one.
This was one of the easiest passages for me. Perfect score. I wish every passage was straight forward like this one.
I don't like this question. My gut told me E, but my logic said its wrong.... Just cause its been in use at a place the longest doesn't mean it originated there.
I thought B would be wrong cause if its taste receptors are removed why do we assume it will eat at all? It only eats nightshade plants because of its taste receptors became habituated with indioside D.
I knew the answer was A but picked E because E made more real world sense. If you're rich enough to own a home you probably do not need a job. As homeownership is a sign of economic prosperity.
I thought D was too predictable for a number 20 question to be the correct answer.
Conclusion: Cop Killed Jorge May-weather,
Simply because the evidence that the COP killed him is wrecked does not allow us to say that he did not kill him.
Jury rules Guilty.
No, I think this is exactly how it works in real life, LOL.
26) I honestly think the REAL (not correct) answer is A) because passage A states "the existence of past injustices..." and passage B) talks about transfers after a point of time. and it talks about rectifying the previous land held by Native Americans. Therefore, I think A is reasonable choice to pick.
Whoops meant this comment for passage two. Disregard.
I was iffy about number 5. Felt A was too strong.
I do not like C because just because there has been a significant increase does not mean that the increase is higher than the demand predicted. It is just as likely that there would be a significant increase because the demand would huge enough to cause a catastrophic shortage. So basically what I'm trying to say is Demand Growth greater than increase in STEM majors.
My problem with answer choice C) is that just says that those types of houses were prevalent but it doesn't mention there was an increase or give support why it increased... so I thought it could not be C).
Nice woke interpretation. Toxic was unnecessary to include like the word woke.