this question was such a big time waster.

Still unsure of how it works in the US, as in maybe I can have the option to withhold their actual review of the app before the December LSAT grades are out, or is completed at least. clueless

If you're using the 7sage application, you might have accidentally reduced the time to say 30 minutes on the part that says Speed, which will then bring your time back by 5 minutes.

You can change the speed anywhere from 35 to 28 minutes, but it still tells you when you have 5 minutes left.

Thank you both! This does clear things up, and i plan on doing what jayswims said, making a generic statement and maying amending small details for the schools im really pressing for.

The process of choosing the right schools to apply to is what im preoccupied with since i'm not sure where exactly my december score will land, but LSAC seems like its going to make things simpler for me by being able to easily send out applications

Who said/what proves that Acme Engines was aware of the potential dangers? What if it wasn't aware of the dangers until after the crash?

I think answer choice E should have said "an indication that Acme engines MAY have been aware"..

The reason is because what if they had not been aware of the potential dangers, but immediately took action to prevent this from occurring again, while STILL trying not to accept blame for the wreck by saying it was an "inconvenience".

They are still guilty of lying as to not be liable for the wreck (still liable even if ignorant of a safety hazard), but maybe not aware of the potential dangers and guilty of discovering and solving a safety hazard way too late

Is there a list of well known counselors/advisors one could decide from?

I surely agree that if any advantage can be gained from a counselor for something we are already investing a lot of time and money into, then ill take it, only i'd like to be sure its as valuable to me as 7sage is.

E is very tricky but the 'sometimes' does make it easier to eliminate. it seems they disagree at first glance of the answer.

This question was the only PSA of Set 1 that I answered with complete ease, although it was a 'harder' question (being the 24th questions at times gives that away) due to two factors:

- the conclusion was very easy to identify

- the wrong answer choices were very obviously wrong and not applicable to the argument.

Has anyone made a cheat-sheet with some of the 'rules' or what to look for with the questions stems? Since there are few that are a little confusing, and some for which i cannot find precise 'rules' from or what to look for, I was wondering if anyone out there had made one.