Hey Nora! would love this as well. Please let me know how i can reach you outside of 7sage. My schedule is mostly flexible as well and we can commit to one day a week! I really need help. I have been in the high 140's

I actually thought of this as a Sufficient Assumption and thought "how do I fill in gap to get from Premises to Conclusion and it make sense" A was the only answer

on question 5 why is A not the correct answer. He jumped to choosing between C and D? Really confused on these type of questions. How should I think about them?

#help (Added by Admin)

So this is how I diagrammed this:

B→A (contrapositive: /A→/B)

L→/B

therefore L→/A

why is this wrong?

#help

following. Share please!

#help

on Q21. I chose E. The tone of the author seem to nto be in full support of the Marcusen theory ( i get paragraph 4 states "Major mistake"" but isnt the Marcuse theory composed of two parts? The manipulation of the advertisers AND the assumption of consumers abilities to make their own informed decisions? Which is why I chose E as it addressed one part of the two part issue. (I hope this makes sense to someone) so why is A correct??? Please #help

the thing about the LSAT or being a lawyer or whatever, is you feel you can "argue" your view on why the WRONG answer choice is RIGHT. Ill make a hell of a lawyer when I pass this thing, bc I have virtually convinced myself of why every wrong answer is in fact not wrong (to me lol)

lol and we thought the LSAT did not test math.....................

Hello I would love to join please send invite

If there is actual support for Answer choice D (premise support: stop use of animals and make other methods more expensive, etc.) then why is E the correct answer choice over D? #help

So question: in weaken questions are we to ATTACK the PREMISES or not? I am a bit confused about that? If yes what other question types call for an attack on the premises? #help