User Avatar
siannais
Joined
May 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
171
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Applications

Stanford
In process
UChicago
In process

Discussions

User Avatar
siannais
Friday, Jul 31

@AgnesAlojado Thank you for your quick reply, I will send the screen recording shortly.

2
User Avatar

Friday, Jul 31

siannais

😖 Frustrated

7Sage Blind Review not working?

I've been trying to complete a BR for a section I took yesterday, but the page won't finish loading. I can't select highlighting options, switch questions, or see the questions recommended for BR. I thought it was a me issue, but I've tried reloading the page, closing out of Chrome, restarting my computer, using incognito mode, and even using another browser. This has been an ongoing issue for at least the last 4 hours.

Not sure how to fix this and not sure whether it's just on my side or an issue with 7Sage's website, but help would be much appreciated since I'm taking the LSAT in a week and was kinda hoping to study...

Ok, as I was about to press send, the highlighter mode started working, but now I'm having another issue: if I highlight things in one colour, but then switch to another, everything previously highlighted disappears... Also, I still can't select other questions. PLS HELP thanks!

2
User Avatar
siannais
Tuesday, Jun 16

@SusanLeifker Well I only got 2/5 right so I can't be doing that well 😭

2
User Avatar
siannais
Wednesday, Jun 10

@CaseySteffen I was confused about this too, but I think you can, he just uses cause effect to more quickly go through the answer choices. E.g. for C), if you look at the passage as solely conditional logic, you may try mapping out C) as if-then, but if you see the passage as cause-effect, then C) is obviously incorrect since there's no causal relationship in the first sentence. This is just a guess though since I had the same question.

2
User Avatar
siannais
Wednesday, Jun 10

This has gotta be one of the layers of hell.

16
User Avatar
siannais
Friday, May 29

For Q5, I translated 21 or older as 21+, but then I thought "in the US" is another condition, so my Lawgic formula was:

21+ and in-the-US --> can-purchase-alcohol

or /can-purchase-alcohol --> /21+ or /in-the-US

Is this incorrect because I'm drawing outside inferences, or why wouldn't being in the US also be a required condition to purchase alcohol? If you're not in the US but still 21+, you still might not be able to purchase alcohol, no?

I realise now that it's because the question assumes 21+ --> (legally allowed to purchase alcohol in the US), where in the US, it is part of the necessary condition of being legal, not something separable from being legally allowed.

3

Confirm action

Are you sure?