Subscription pricing
Is there a timeline on when printables of the new format prep tests will be available?
PT Questions
sighsunusual0c231
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
sighsunusual0c231
Sunday, Sep 29 2024
Bad question. Whoever wrote it clearly have no idea how a ICE car work.
sighsunusual0c231
Tuesday, Sep 24 2024
The reason I eliminated answer choice D is because I didn't think it was a reasonable assumption that, just because cars have changed design, it can take credit for the sharp decline between peak year and the very next year, unless almost everyone decided to get the new design right away. It takes years for old cars to phase out. It wouldn't explain one year it's peak, the very next year is at least 15% reduction from previous year.
sighsunusual0c231
Monday, Oct 23 2023
Does this mean there could be a total of 3 logical reasoning sections (including the one that doesn’t count)?
sighsunusual0c231
Wednesday, Oct 11 2023
Thank you all for your input. I really appreciate it. I will definitely continue to spend time reviewing the lessons!
Hello,
I am needing advise from the group. Any input is greatly appreciated, especially those of you who had been in my shoes.
I plan to take the June 2024 LSAT, and apply for law school that fall for 2025 entry. I don’t have a lot of time to study because I am working full time, have a brand new baby, and my wife is super busy with her work (she’s a hospital resident). I can probably devote at most 2 hours a day to study, and many days I don’t’ have that time. That’s really not enough time in my opinion to study especially that I am very new to the test, but I am 30 with more and more obligations at home, I feel like if I want to give law school a shot, it’s gotta be now and not later. (I am not trying to say older people shouldn’t go, I just think for me, it’s time).
We know for sure we will be moving back to the St. Louis area after my wife finishes her residency in June of 2025, so school-wise, I really only have three choices, WUSTL, SLU, and Mizzou (I’d have to live as west of STL as possible and have long commute). I have a less than ideal UGPA (3.16), which means WUSTL is going to be far reach even if I get a 170+. So I am pretty much setting a realistic goal of SLU or Mizzou. I think getting into those two schools should be possible if I can get a LSAT of 155-160. My last three practice tests are 146, 153, and 145.
I have been going through the lessons one by one. But I couldn’t help but feel like, in my situation, perhaps I should instead just stick to doing two practice tests a week, and make sure I diligently complete the blind review, and watch explanation videos on all low/high risk questions. As much as I find the lessons helpful, and it’s a long way till June, with limited time I can devote to studying each day , I feel like the lessons may not be for me.
What do you think? Again, I would really appreciate any feedback at all!
sighsunusual0c231
Thursday, Mar 07 2024
@ Does the method in the gif turn off automatic cc or is this step required every time a video start?
sighsunusual0c231
Tuesday, Aug 06 2024
Feeling the same here. But just curious, why do you all decide to take the next one in October. I'm planning to take it again in November, but now doubting if that's too late. Most of the schools on my list don't start reviewing until December so I didn't consider taking the next one sooner.
sighsunusual0c231
Thursday, Apr 04 2024
Great thank you for the clarification!
Everywhere else I read says LSAT has gone back to having a fourth unscored section. But looking at the three options offered on the prep tests here confused me a little. To confirm, will there be an experimental section for the August LSAT?
The prep test starting page gives the three options below:
Plus, it seems like in the past the experimental sections has always been LR. Is it possible that the August test could have an additional RC question instead? How did the LSAC test new RC questions in the past?
Thanks for your time!
What I am still not getting is that, if “all skeptics” is a subgroup of “general public”, wouldn’t Waller’s statement about “accepted by the general public” automatically inclusive of “satisfy all skeptics”?
If someone says driving all cars carry risk of fatal accidents, it’s also correct that the person would also agree that driving a Volkswagen carry risk of fatal accidents?