- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I wish that there was a seperate analytics for drills to see what types of reasoning are easier or harder.
chose A but C was correct. I got the assumption part correct but chose the wrong answer. PAIN
I am interested as well, my ADHD is out of control. I am trying my best to study for November
I'm interested! also taking the LSAT in November
This is so helpful. Thank you for explaining
I love misidentifying context/background with a premise. Pain
I am interested as well
I am also taking November and hoping for a score increase and would be interested in a study group as well. As for words of encouragement, do not let one bad drill, section, or PT get you down. Your analytics will fluctuate as well. I noticed this with LR especially.
felt this, my toxic trait is narrowing down to two answers and selecting the wrong one
love how I got rid of C, D, E and narrowed down to A and B but somehow chose B.
had D but changed to A in BR. I was confused because I thought this was a flaw question and questioned answer choice D
This is a great analogy, thank you for this!
Would it mean the same thing as the the odds of something going wrong during whole journey (sum of the parts) because there are multiple instances where this could happen?
I thought the opposite of what was said, which is that the probability of parts (individually) are not the same the whole (combined).
by some miracle I chose D
small studies more common --> featured in newspaper more often
I anticipated the flaw prior to seeing the answer choices. This lesson was very helpful too.
I am not sure if this applies to all flaw-descriptive weakening questions, but for the last two we did, I used causal logic to pick the correct answer. Remember hypotheses, causation vs correlation, alternative causes, multiple causes, etc.
flaws were one of my worst sections, but now the right vs wrong answers are slowly starting to click. well we will see if I get humbled later
you have got to be KIDDING. I had B first but chose C :(
So we heard assumptions aren't usually present in arguments when doing NA/SA. Is this just for assumptions from the author/speaker that are absent from the premises? Are assumptions from others/critics present in the context typically? #feedback #help
this question was awful
narrowed down to D and E and chose D. WHYYYY
love JY's voice in my head saying "Who cares?!"
I though the same thing in blind review.