this was rly simple dont get tripped up yall. He responds by addressing the conclusion (speaks about each point in his conclusion).... so I looked for the ac with conclusion stated and moved on.
@monkeygirl333 I originally chose E as well, and on BR, I realized that I was attracted to it because of how it was the other extreme of A.
I read through A, saw "one" and thought that's not enough...then I sped to E, saw "each" and mentally committed to that AC.
By the time I got around the B, I ruled it out because of the part about the professor not considering the observations.
the problem with E is that the critic does not address each/every premise offered (e.g., rappers can work alone)
what makes B correct is that it accurately describes the critic's reponse
for the tradition claim, the critic says that rap itself is a tradition and that it uses older songs
for the individual claim, the critic says that rappers have to consider the public (a different kind of collaboration that the professor did not consider)
I know this is a late reply, but whenever you are uncertain about an answer choice, I always stick with my initial thought unless I have utter certainty that another answer is correct
JY thinks emotive reactions to answer choices qualifies as an explanation-- it's not!! please be more direct and expressive in the explanations. #feedback
Hello! :) could you please explain a bit more why E is not right? In the explanation video you did say it challenged both the individualistic and the nontraditional form.... is it because it ALSO adds pieces of info additional to what he is challenging?
ER is wrong because it says he challenges ALL of the professors claims, when the critic doesn't challenge any of the claims. He brings up new points that the professor didn't consider.
Even if you try to link what the critic said to what the professor said, the critic never addresses how rap is not a formal learning process which the professor stated as a premise.
I'm going to piggyback on this reply. I was stuck between B and E, and on blind review and the drill, I picked E, too. I'm still not confident how it's wrong.
The critic does not challenge any of the professor's premises. They disagree with the professor's conclusion and offer new evidence that the professor did not consider.
tripped on B "did not take into account". Thought, well yes, he took into account that tradition was not there. Thought 'not taking into account' would have to be completely separate idea :P oops! For me, getting to B by PEO for sure
@CYS1123 simply because they were not stated. The critic is not challenging the professor's assumptions, they are challenging the professor's statements and specifically addressing the conclusion.
The markers keep leaving from the video, like I can't directly skip to A, B, C etc. It fixes itself every time i re-open the window, but goes away after each video...is anyone having this issue also? it's getting REALLY annoying
From how I understood it, he doesn't challenge that point. I thought that because the critic starts out with saying "but," which indicated that they did acknowledge the professor's claims but wanted to add onto it.
the music critic is challenging the conclusion that the professor made (rap music being individualistic and nontraditional) by saying there are things they didn't take into observation. the critic is not only challenging the point, they're also adding more points the professor failed to consider. so essentially how I understood it is, he's disagreeing with the professor's conclusion especially since he used "but" and he's adding extra info the professor missed. the critic is basically saying, "how can you come up with this conclusion when there are things you didn't acknowledge/missed that if acknowledged, would lead to a different conclusion".
83 comments
studying for the lsat to represent young thug in his trial
lmao
LOL
that's a big word for elmo
Me and Bro talking about the new Carti album.
this was rly simple dont get tripped up yall. He responds by addressing the conclusion (speaks about each point in his conclusion).... so I looked for the ac with conclusion stated and moved on.
@erarabiameyer yeah he immediately attacks the conclusion (tradition) and then provides two new examples.
i immediately prephased that the answer might suggest that he responded by providing an alternative explanation
Got all of them right, thank you 7sage !
Yo, yo, yo!
All you sucka MC's ain't got nothin' on me
From my grades, to my lines, you can't touch Kevin G
Im a mathlete, the nerd is inferred
But forget what you heard, I'm like James Bond the third
Sha-sha shaken, not stirred, I'm Kevin Gnapoor
The G's silent when I sneak in your door
I make love to your woman on the bathroom floor
I don't play it like Shaggy, you'll know it was me
Cause the next time you see her she'd be like
Ohhhhhh, Kevin G.!
Happy holidays, everybody!
This is gold, haha. My mom and I would always joke about this. Happy Holidays!
Omg thank you for bringing in such great humor… HAHAH!!!
was between B and E and for whatever reason chose E and knew it was wrong and then got the BR correct instantly. how do i stop doing that 🙃
@monkeygirl333 I keep doing the exact same thing
@monkeygirl333 I originally chose E as well, and on BR, I realized that I was attracted to it because of how it was the other extreme of A.
I read through A, saw "one" and thought that's not enough...then I sped to E, saw "each" and mentally committed to that AC.
By the time I got around the B, I ruled it out because of the part about the professor not considering the observations.
the problem with E is that the critic does not address each/every premise offered (e.g., rappers can work alone)
what makes B correct is that it accurately describes the critic's reponse
for the tradition claim, the critic says that rap itself is a tradition and that it uses older songs
for the individual claim, the critic says that rappers have to consider the public (a different kind of collaboration that the professor did not consider)
I picked A b/c I fell for the trap but Ik why its wrong now thanks for this explanation bestie
this section suuuuuuucccked
you have got to be KIDDING. I had B first but chose C :(
I know this is a late reply, but whenever you are uncertain about an answer choice, I always stick with my initial thought unless I have utter certainty that another answer is correct
Expected time: 1:32. Elapsed time 1:32. 😎
Must be nice 😭I'm getting these right, but I'm usually over the target time
JY thinks emotive reactions to answer choices qualifies as an explanation-- it's not!! please be more direct and expressive in the explanations. #feedback
Hello! :) could you please explain a bit more why E is not right? In the explanation video you did say it challenged both the individualistic and the nontraditional form.... is it because it ALSO adds pieces of info additional to what he is challenging?
Which answer choices can I help you with more?
ER is wrong because it says he challenges ALL of the professors claims, when the critic doesn't challenge any of the claims. He brings up new points that the professor didn't consider.
Even if you try to link what the critic said to what the professor said, the critic never addresses how rap is not a formal learning process which the professor stated as a premise.
I'm going to piggyback on this reply. I was stuck between B and E, and on blind review and the drill, I picked E, too. I'm still not confident how it's wrong.
The critic does not challenge any of the professor's premises. They disagree with the professor's conclusion and offer new evidence that the professor did not consider.
tripped on B "did not take into account". Thought, well yes, he took into account that tradition was not there. Thought 'not taking into account' would have to be completely separate idea :P oops! For me, getting to B by PEO for sure
Broke my streak :(
Who is J.Y.'s favorite rapper?
probably yuno miles
@michaelbagh03629 martin luther king, shout out to big bro.
6/7 THATS A WIN!!!
But why should I assume that the professor didn't take those factors into account just because he didnt mention them?
@CYS1123 simply because they were not stated. The critic is not challenging the professor's assumptions, they are challenging the professor's statements and specifically addressing the conclusion.
chose A then switched to B during blind review LFG
I came to the comments expecting a rap comment.
bro i'm cooking these MOR questions Yass
struggled with this section the most out of all of them and ive watched the videos numerous times
I am getting all of these wrong. Between NA and MR I might die.
Oh well, the only question I got wrong in this section and I got the BR right. I'll take it as a win
I better be the argumentative equivalent of Neo in the matrix when these lessons are over.
The markers keep leaving from the video, like I can't directly skip to A, B, C etc. It fixes itself every time i re-open the window, but goes away after each video...is anyone having this issue also? it's getting REALLY annoying
Can someone explain this better? Does he not challenge the point that music is not individual and go off traditions in his entire response?
From how I understood it, he doesn't challenge that point. I thought that because the critic starts out with saying "but," which indicated that they did acknowledge the professor's claims but wanted to add onto it.
the music critic is challenging the conclusion that the professor made (rap music being individualistic and nontraditional) by saying there are things they didn't take into observation. the critic is not only challenging the point, they're also adding more points the professor failed to consider. so essentially how I understood it is, he's disagreeing with the professor's conclusion especially since he used "but" and he's adding extra info the professor missed. the critic is basically saying, "how can you come up with this conclusion when there are things you didn't acknowledge/missed that if acknowledged, would lead to a different conclusion".