@ said:

@ said:

same I hated that game. I think I stumbled upon PT9 S3 G3. Tho I think the one on October LSAT was harder

What made October’s harder?

The fact that I didn't get a good game board set up lol. But maybe bc test pressure. I also don't distinctly remember that game anymore

same I hated that game. I think I stumbled upon PT9 S3 G3. Tho I think the one on October LSAT was harder

It’s really hard to provide specific advice without knowing what trips you up. Assuming you have good strategy during the test (avoiding time sinks, adjusting your confidence level to sometimes select the correct answer rather than process of elimination, and you are finishing each section without being rushed) , my advice is to check out the 7Sage statistics to see if there are any particular types of LG types that trip you up and drill those. Then do that for LR and RC. For me, I purchased another book (Manhattan prep) for RC because I didn’t think J.Y’s method worked for me at all and that helped me. Then, if you have the time, perhaps take a break. For some reason, after a break it boosted my score too

C got me because I read that "A" is a factor in causing it but not sufficient to cause it. And if C is true that there are many different factors that may cause ball lightning then I assumed that could mean that more than 1 factor is necessary to cause ball lightning since it is just a factor. (e.g. I have to be in the wrong place and wrong time to be hit by lightning, remove one of those factors and it doesn't happen)

Q#8. I don't think you can eliminate D based on "scientific controversy" as they do discuss disagreements about the interpretation of data and it seemed like Wenner and their contemporaries mistakenly believed something and that resulted in a faulty hypothesis. However, the you can eliminate D based on "function" as J.Y. said

Not sure if still going on or available, but I am interested. I am in the same boat--low to mid 160s and want 170+ on June LSAT.

Also interested if still available and messaging you my email

Did Lawgic on blind review, I think to torture myself. This was a doozy, but good practice!

I'm interested in this too! For clarification, are you saying that your last 5 blind review scores are between 170-176? Mine are consistently around 171/172 without reviewing each question--only ones that I have time sinks on (>110 secs) or didn't get to bc of time sinks. I haven't done any deep review sessions with anyone and would love to try!