- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
@trevorn89645175 i usually wake up at 8am and try to begin a test at 9am, that way I can be done testing at noon and done with blind review (only for flagged questions) at 1pm. I go over wrong answers at like 6pm, so I have 1pm-6pm to do whatever I want -- but I also am not in school or working a 9-5 right now!!
do one 4 section test every single morning on LSAC! just to get yourself adjusted to the format. completely simulate everything on test day. same amount of scratch paper, pencils, all electronics out of the room, take the 10 minute break and not a minute more or less. pull up a proctor on .
then, that afternoon/night, pull up a document and screenshot/insert every single question you got wrong. write 2-3 sentences about why you missed that question. then go to your analytics and drill like 10 problems in your worst section. i did this and im now averaging 178-179 :))
the argument: "the ban helped the fish"
the right answer choice should therefore prove that the ban on fishing did NOT help the fish. (B) becomes much more obvious of an answer choice with this in mind.
A) is right because the shoppers don't look at the merchandise until AFTER they walk past the Maxlast on sale hammers. i just misinterpreted what this answer was saying
B) which I incorrectly chose is wrong - just because
customers are attracted to quality doesnt mean they see low prices in a poor light. nothing would encourage them to choose the non-on-sale hammers over the on-sale ones because NOTHING is specified about their comparative qualities.
i missed when it said the local fishing guide "BELIEVES"!!!!! broooooo
god i don't understand how this is only a 4/5 difficulty when i still CANNOT understand at all why C is the correct answer
(A) the passage doesn't talk about what SHOULD or SHOULD NOT be done, rather just commentary on the difficulty of determining rights
(B) you can bestow rights on animals w/o bestowing rights on plants! for ex, you could say that organisms with critical thinking abilities deserve right. this answer choice does not reference聽"construing the phrase 'living things' broadly" - which is the primary聽way "One cannot bestow rights on animals w/o bestowing rights on some plants"
(C) it is okay to delineate a boundary! just not entirely by itself w/o any聽other criteria. also, how do we know it interferes with EVERY attempt to establish animal rights? maybe somebody is okay with only giving rights to more intellectual animals - that is a more narrow attempt. therefore, "delineating聽a boundary based on the set 'living things'" did not interfere in this situation! making this answer wrong.
(D) correct b/c:聽this answer choice is saying,
in order to establish rights for all animals:
- some plants need to be given rights too (e.g., broadly construing the definition of "living things") OR
- you need to factor in other restrictions for rights aside from "the organism has gotta be a living thing" to narrow it down to JUST all animals w/o plants.
(E) it is not irrelevant to determining rights for animals - it is an important criteria. it is just not enough ON ITS OWN to make that clean, perfect determination. it is hard to determine the scope of defining "living things": but that does not mean that determining if an animal is "living" is ENTIRELY IRRELEVANT!
(a) the stimulus NEVER mentions what pollinating insects are NOT attracted to. poppy petals attract pollinating insects, yeah we know聽that - but maybe wilted聽ones do too! we don't know if that is true or not!
(b) correct b/c there is an explicit relationship stated: "substance CAUSES its petals to wilt within one or two days" - no ifs ands or buts about it! no maybe, no MIGHT cause.
(c) flowers of "all plants" wayy too broad
(d) the pollen聽is NOT stopping the petals from absorbing the nutrients, rather, it is a SUBSTANCE released from the flower itself that wilts the petals. nowhere in the stimulus聽does it say, "nutrients not being absorbed leads to wilting"
(e) plant as a whole聽is not mentioned in the stimulus. only the petals
hisoka 馃槇馃槇