I'm copying and pasting my own comment to a very similar question in a different thread. In case you missed that, please consider this:

"I will be taking the test next Sunday, which is the official "September" date for the LSAT administered in Asia. It will also be undisclosed, just as the LSAT administered in the UK, as you mentioned. By nature of the test being undisclosed, NO ONE can possibly "factually confirm" whether the test will be different.

That being said, if one had to guess, yes, the content may be different; more important, however, the difficulty - not so much. As we all know, the LSAT is a "standardized" test; while I have not come across a hard, physical data that show that the average LSAT score in Asia (or in other parts of the world, for that matter) is different from that of the US, I would make a reasonable assumption that the LSAC has no reasons or incentives to administer significantly different tests across continents.

So I wouldn't worry about prepping for the "correct LSAT." Any rumors you hear about the differences in the test are just that - rumors. Theoretically, what you learn here on 7sage and on your own will be as applicable and valid in one part of the world as in another."

Now that I re-read it, I was probably wrong about "NO ONE" being able to factually confirm any discrepancies. But I still believe that theoretically, no difference in the test would have resulted in a dramatic influence on your performance that would have caused you to get a significantly different score had you sat on the test administered in another part of the world (I'm sorry this sentence reads like a stim in LR - I must be in the LSAT state of mind....).

I will be taking the test next Sunday, which is the official "September" date for the LSAT administered in Asia. It will also be undisclosed, just as the LSAT administered in the UK, as you mentioned. By nature of the test being undisclosed, NO ONE can possibly "factually confirm" whether the test will be different.

That being said, if one had to guess, yes, the content may be different; more important, however, the difficulty - not so much. As we all know, the LSAT is a "standardized" test; while I have not come across a hard, physical data that show that the average LSAT score in Asia (or in other parts of the world, for that matter) is different from that of the US, I would make a reasonable assumption that the LSAC has no reasons or incentives to administer significantly different tests across continents.

So I wouldn't worry about prepping for the "correct LSAT." Any rumors you hear about the differences in the test are just that - rumors. Theoretically, what you learn here on 7sage and on your own will be as applicable and valid in one part of the world as in another.

His words ring truer during days like this...

Thank you so much for your honest, insightful views, joegotbored-1 and Jonathan! For now, I will just keep my eyes on the prize (LSAT)!

Could you have technically linked /S to CTH (in other words, assuming that the computer software will not be successful unless the cost is NOT high), instead of /CPPB, and still reach the same conclusion? (my question doesn't have anything to do with picking C as the answer; I just want to see if my understanding on the structure of how these things connect is correct).

Before deciding to freak out because of this new policy, I wanted to share a few reasons to remain calm and positive about the change. Purely my own opinion, so feel free to criticize, correct, add or agree with me.

First of all, those of us who are enrolled in 7sage now and anytime before the licence expiration date ends have all the access to the PDFs until then, so there is not much for us to worry about; just download them all (wait, don't tell me you were going to let your subscription expire without having downloaded all the PDFs). If anything, I feel bad for the future students for the inconvinience caused by this change.

Secondly, the main reason I (and I suspect many other students) am enrolled in the 7sage course is not because of the PDF files they are offering, but for its lessons as well as the detailed explanations (in addition to a supportive community and the excellent free analytics tool).

While I do not know how 7sage's pricing model works, I suspect that 7sage's primary source of revenue was from selling PDFs (remember those $7 pdfs + explanations offers? those were basically freebees. sigh... those were the days...). Sure, 7sage will have to work on new pricing and stuff, but I am certain that it won't be the "end" of 7sage or other LSAT online courses out there. If anything, print/book-PTs might even encourage future students to more actively seek out additional resources, like 7sage. That leads me to my next point.

7sage is already so cheap and affordable compared to any other online resources (If you know a more affordable website with equal or better quality, please let me know. Sorry, 7sage). Without the price of PDFs included in the course bundles, 7sage will seem even more affordable to the future students, and more people might sign up as a result. (As a personal anecdote, when I first discovered 7sage, I was hesistant to sign up, only because I already had all the PTs. I'm glad I signed up anyhoo.)

Of course, some may make better and more valid arguments about how this might harm 7sage and other online prep services. But I have faith in 7sage, and I believe that it is the quality of the lessons/explanations and the lively forums that keeps us wanting to come back for more, not the sales of PDFs.

I do think this policy is unnecessary and, frankly, stupid. But the all-mighty LSAC has spoken. For now, let's all hope for the best.

Technically, can I say that D is implying a biconditional relationship, instead of a suf-nec confusion? Or perhaps, inappropriately implying a bicon relationship IS confusing suf-nec conditions?

Not really important, but was just wondering.

@3:47, can you safely generalize that most in NA questions, conditional statements are not the correct answers?

Good luck guys!!

In case it helps anyone... I think I found the answer in Duke's instructions: "Candidates who apply through the Early Decision program may apply to other law schools, but may not have more than one binding Early Decision application pending simultaneously. If an Early Decision application has already been submitted to another law school, candidates may apply through Duke's Early Decision program only if and when they are released from their binding commitment at the other school."

couldn't help but notice the use of bicondi at the last sentence.. lol.

Haha thank you, this is what I was looking for.

Becuz.

Watching other people do LSAT is what I do with my downtime.