@christinajooce205 agree! once i recognized the argument type as phenomenon-hypothesis in the blind review I was able to get this correct, but in the initial review, it was confusing and I thought it was A as well.

Got this correct, but had a "how to study" type of question -- Is it bad if I got the answer correct, but didn't catch how the negates "all" fits into B, but just intuitively got to the "some" conclusion?

Also, in every single LSAT question - is it recommended that you read through all of the answer choices before selecting the answer? For this one, I read until C and it was a no brainer that B was the correct answer, so I submitted it first and then went through all of the answer choices in the blind review. Wondering when taking the actual LSAT if that's bad practice.

@BaileyB I think this might be because "No" is a Group 4 Indicator, meaning it's negate necessary. So the negated part would go to the necessary part of the claim. So if it's no parrots are clever, then it would be P --> / C. The contrapositive of this would be C --> /P. Therefore, my thinking is that /P--> C would be confusing sufficiency for necessity