- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
#help I am struggling to understand the Kick it up to the conditional conclusion rule. So, if someone could check my summary and let me know if I am misunderstanding something that would be great!
To summarize, you are reading a statement that is invalid because the premises are not premises they are just facts. Further the "missing rule" here are actual premises. The goal here is to find what would be the appropriate premises to have to ensure a valid argument and that the premises support the conclusion.
#help from my understanding, the necessary condition falls to the right of the arrow which signals the conditional relationship. So, the concept following the indicator, which signals the necessary conditions should fall to the right of the arrow. For Q3 for example, wouldn't it be:
Written -> Survived
/Survive -> /written
since survived immediately proceeds "only"?? please let me know if I am missing a crucial step!
I am interested!!
I'll be there in like 10 I'm walking from Starbucks
Do y'all wanna meet on the 1st floor?
I could do the IC or a cafe near by
Perfect I actually go to loyola so that works out
What does everyone's schedule look like?
@ said:
Hello my name is Olivia and I am aiming to take the October 2025 LSAT. I work very well studying/creating study plans with others. Message me if you are just starting out and are also looking to have an online group.
Hi Olivia, I would love to join!