- Joined
- Jul 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
“Only” introduces necessary condition. “The only” introduces sufficient condition.
For the hard weaken flaw except questions, the one you feel like is the most relevant is often times not the most relevant.
I absolutely need to remember to PREPHRASE the argument in my head and remember to negation test NA questions to avoid stupid mistakes like this. If you feed a 1-year old kid salty food for a year they'll like salty food more than sweet food. Author concludes that it's because of what flavor you exposed the kid to. Causal NA is just like strengthen - any other alternatives? Rule them out. Thus A is absolutely the best answer.
Chose A because I thought it was the best answer out of all the bad answers. Eliminated B too soon because it is super strong but forgot you should actually like strong answers for SA. A is also pretty wrong because why does it only touch on the "reduce biological diversity of ecosystems"...it's very weak and does not add much to the conclusion.
P: MP -> /Pt by o
C: Mp -> /know true
Basically
P: A-> B
C: A-> C
In SA, this means B->C
Look for answers that says B->C, which is
/Pt by o -> /know true
Which is also know true -> pt by o
which is answer choice E.
Find P & C
Find MA
Find what must be true for MA to be true
Revisit C to limit scope & relevance of answer
"some dogs are descended from wolves THAT WERE DOMESTICATED MUCH MORE RECENTLY THAN OTHERS". focal point is wolf. I did not prephrase this conclusion accurately.
similar topics = red flag. almost always wrong
"must" should match "must".
I was left between A and D, and sadly ended up choosing D. Upon reflection, I just confused weaken and strengthen. My biggest weakness when it comes to weakening and strengthening is that I forget the argument I'm trying to weaken when I'm going down the ACs. Perhaps drawing down notes would help.
E actually goes against the author. The author does not assume that the reduction of workers is irrelevant...the author thinks it IS relevant. I was very tempted by B, but I crossed it out too fast because of the "production rate" tripped me out.
takes for granted = NA. takes for granted = NA. takes for granted = NA. takes for granted = NA. takes for granted = NA.
Hi all, haven't seen a group like this, so I decided to start one myself. So I have pretty bad ADHD and need accountability partners. The good thing is I easily get hyper-fixated, so when I'm studying, I'm super locked in.
The main reason for this group is that I figured I think through questions a bit differently from typical explanations, and I was wondering if any other ADHDers or neurodivergent folks feel the same. Hoping to host virtual Zoom sessions to hang out with and discuss questions together.
A bit about me:
Located in the LA area, Pacific Time Zone
Free in the afternoon and evening mostly
Taking the September + October LSAT
Started studying a month ago, currently scoring in the low 160s, aiming for 170+
I talk to myself a lot
I was bitten by a radioactive spider
Hit me up or join the group! Really excited to form a community here.
Key word is interpretation!