ive never had this much trouble with a question set before Wow is it over

bro this is the one question i didnt get even after BR. i felt like i was getting ragebaited

@c00lbeans Yes because if all As are Bs, and all As are Cs, then that would mean all Bs are Cs. Since we know"some" can potentially include "all," then B <-s-> C is also correct.

would it be context clues that determine whether or not an "or" is inclusive or exclusive? like obviously for the picking a spot at the table, you physically cannot be in two spots at once. but why is it possible that Jon is able to pick both Econ 101 and Polisci 101? it's not a given that he can/can't do that, cause what if there is a rule about not being able to take both? I'm just a bit confused on this part

@KassandraMadrgial9 I think he's more so talking about the support relationship between the premises and the conclusion