Subscription pricing
Hello guys please when solving an LR problem is it okay to ignore the context and read the argument only to be a little fast, since we just need premise and conclusion.
Thank you
PT Questions
staphyk261
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
staphyk261
Friday, May 15 2020
staphyk261
Wednesday, May 13 2020
Great! ,thank you> @ said:
I agree with Magnificent2021. Also, I think the context becomes slightly more important in the later exams. PT 86.1.15 is a prime example of this. For problems with little to no indicators you must develop your intuition by working through a lot of LR problems and analyzing structure. Think about which sentences offer support and which are supported.
staphyk261
Wednesday, May 13 2020
Thanks for your reply,How about a situation where there is no indicator? > @ said:
I would say taking the context into account will give us an understanding of the structure in stimulus. Note indicators in the stimulus and where there is shift from context to the core argument: premise and conclusion.
Hello “anticipating the trigger” that’s where the problem lies.
How to do that fast and accurately ?> @ said:
Hey guys just wanted to impart some wisdom. Sufficient Assumptions questions are easy if you follow this 4 step process.
1.Identify Conclusion/Understand it
Identify Premise/Understand it
Isolate the Conclusion(Important)
Anticipate a Trigger that would force the the conclusion to happen
Instead of thinking about SA questions like you need to fill in the blank. Think of them like a handgun. All you need to do is pull the trigger. All SA is a pull of the Trigger/or a push of the roller coaster button. Once you start to think like this they become so easy.
DM me with any questions if this helped