If anyone wants to review PT 68 with me tomorrow (Friday) over google hangout/skype. private message me and we can get started. Logical reasoning, both sections.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Hey Kyuya,
What exactly do you get stuck on? (The rare special rules, the "twists", etc).
I promise you, do all the games you had the slightest bit of trouble; print ten clean copies of each and do it habitually. It will come. When you are redoing it, place yourself in a "new" position (pretend that you've never seen that game before and try to do it). It may sound ridiculous but it helped me.
All I can say is keep doing the fool-proof guide to perfection on LG.
Are you reacting to how the game is set up? Like if a game said "scientist are testing 5 of 7 medicines A B C D E F G, are you making 5 in and 2 out? After doing the games over and over again, you should start to react instantly. It took me more than a few months to get it down.
If you're doing the games prior to 2000, those games are arguably harder than today's games. Today's games are much more forgiving. But it still helps to go back and master the older games.
Depends,
How are you doing on the more recent PT's (60-68)?
There are stories where people just studied for 2 weeks and scored high.
Lol, I'm reading on reddit how people had proctors from hell; they come 40 minutes late, frisked the test takers like they were at an airport, very strict in giving instructions, etc.
Here it was pretty laid back. One person forgot her photo on her admission ticket and was still able to take the test.
Hey James,
I think you are right on the mark with that. HA arguing about patients suffering and CA is making a comparative statement about patients who suffer more/less.
The Secret of Monkey Island....if anyone knows what that is, I applaud you for being part of the greatest kid generation ever.
Only now do I understand what you meant by "intuitive feel". I went back to this and I at first I was like there is just no way at Q23 under timed conditions can anyone get this right through conditional logic and solved it through understanding and finding that assumption.
Hey Jerrald,
It still depends largely on the game whether or not you have to resort to sub-diagramming. If you find spots where stuff like either A or B must go in this slot, then you would make sub-diagrams for each and see if that affects the other rules.
If a question asks you to put C in group 3, how does that affect the rest of the variables? Almost all the time something triggers or is an "eye-opener".
Other than that, I would keep doing the LG method guide. It took me about 2-3 months and everyday of drilling to go through grouping games like water.
5. And remember your J.Y.isms. When the clock is ticking, you're on the last question of the last section, palms are sweaty, your head is heavy and a million things are running through your mind, and you're looking at the answer choices, just ask yourself this:
"Okay, so what?"
-J.Y. Ping
I'm soo ashamed lol. They got me!! They got me with B!!!!
@ashakoorian839
That's why I was hesitant to get those lol. Who knows? I might have received the faulty one.
@sy2484832-Ah Yoo
I wouldn't get that. I read reviews that it breaks down easily. Get a watch with a bezel.
I'm not advocating you get the watch in the video (the tissot is like $1500 I think) but a simple plastic casio with a bezel would do just fine which is like $10-$15)
@monayli354
Meditate :D
And after that say to yourself "I will f$8k this test up!!!!!" while listening to some motivational music.
This is mines:
(caution: strong language)
I remember you mentioned something about LSAT using random ideas but still logically connecting them with one another and I think this question is a prime example. It was so hard at first to see that "appetite cannot be satisfied..." as the "gap".
I noticed that NA are a lot harder than the older test because of the most random ideas that produce the subtle gaps.
Hey everyone,
You can click on the persons name and "PM" them. This is a good way to start google hangouts/ skype if you feel hesitant about sharing your personal info/email publicly. This is how me and a couple other 7sagers got to do BR over GH, by PMing each other through here.
Keep doing the games over and over again until you feel like you're getting carpal tunnel and crying blood.
I'm kidding, but you should always try to do games that you had trouble with (finding all the inferences, shortcuts, etc.) over and over again.
http://classic.7sage.com/how-to-get-a-perfect-score-on-the-logic-games/
aww shiznit! I see. "None of the plays will be popular several centuries from now "is the conclusion. And after that is the premise: the only ones that get to be performed regularly are the ones that do X. The drama critic may not know of the plays existence but still yet the play could fulfill criteria X.
I'm still a little dumbfounded on intervening time being a referential phrase though. Is it referring to the "century", or "decade"?
Hey Sunyuchencn,
I think "attends" in this case means to "match up" or "meet our expectations".
The "simple arithmetical facts" gives us an example of the computer dependent proofs.
Sure. I'll be sure to make a post there when I get the chance! Be sure to look for it soon :D
Is the "two or more" superfluous? I feel like you just needed "two objectionable characteristics".
Hey Sunyuchencn,
Necessary assumption answer choices can sometimes act like sufficient assumption answer choices in that they make a "bridge"
https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/how-to-find-necessary-assumptions-3/
Hope this helps!
Analyze those rules and inferences carefully. Take more than 10+ minutes if you have to. For those future games that you will have trouble on, look back at them and analyze what was wrong. Be sure not to look at the explanations and answers until you've got it down. Use the explanations as a last resort.