User Avatar
unhappymeal
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Saturday, Jul 13 2013

Analyze those rules and inferences carefully. Take more than 10+ minutes if you have to. For those future games that you will have trouble on, look back at them and analyze what was wrong. Be sure not to look at the explanations and answers until you've got it down. Use the explanations as a last resort.

0
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Saturday, Jul 13 2013

Hey Kyuya,

What exactly do you get stuck on? (The rare special rules, the "twists", etc).

I promise you, do all the games you had the slightest bit of trouble; print ten clean copies of each and do it habitually. It will come. When you are redoing it, place yourself in a "new" position (pretend that you've never seen that game before and try to do it). It may sound ridiculous but it helped me.

1
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Friday, Jul 12 2013

All I can say is keep doing the fool-proof guide to perfection on LG.

Are you reacting to how the game is set up? Like if a game said "scientist are testing 5 of 7 medicines A B C D E F G, are you making 5 in and 2 out? After doing the games over and over again, you should start to react instantly. It took me more than a few months to get it down.

If you're doing the games prior to 2000, those games are arguably harder than today's games. Today's games are much more forgiving. But it still helps to go back and master the older games.

0
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Friday, Jun 28 2013

Depends,

How are you doing on the more recent PT's (60-68)?

There are stories where people just studied for 2 weeks and scored high.

0
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Thursday, Jun 13 2013

Lol, I'm reading on reddit how people had proctors from hell; they come 40 minutes late, frisked the test takers like they were at an airport, very strict in giving instructions, etc.

Here it was pretty laid back. One person forgot her photo on her admission ticket and was still able to take the test.

1
PrepTests ·
PT106.S1.Q7
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Sunday, Jun 09 2013

Hey James,

I think you are right on the mark with that. HA arguing about patients suffering and CA is making a comparative statement about patients who suffer more/less.

1
PrepTests ·
PT138.S2.Q13
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Saturday, Jun 08 2013

The Secret of Monkey Island....if anyone knows what that is, I applaud you for being part of the greatest kid generation ever.

1
PrepTests ·
PT118.S1.Q23
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Saturday, Jun 08 2013

Only now do I understand what you meant by "intuitive feel". I went back to this and I at first I was like there is just no way at Q23 under timed conditions can anyone get this right through conditional logic and solved it through understanding and finding that assumption.

0
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Friday, Jun 07 2013

Hey Jerrald,

It still depends largely on the game whether or not you have to resort to sub-diagramming. If you find spots where stuff like either A or B must go in this slot, then you would make sub-diagrams for each and see if that affects the other rules.

If a question asks you to put C in group 3, how does that affect the rest of the variables? Almost all the time something triggers or is an "eye-opener".

Other than that, I would keep doing the LG method guide. It took me about 2-3 months and everyday of drilling to go through grouping games like water.

1
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Friday, Jun 07 2013

5. And remember your J.Y.isms. When the clock is ticking, you're on the last question of the last section, palms are sweaty, your head is heavy and a million things are running through your mind, and you're looking at the answer choices, just ask yourself this:

"Okay, so what?"

-J.Y. Ping

8
PrepTests ·
PT137.S4.Q8
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Thursday, Jun 06 2013

I'm soo ashamed lol. They got me!! They got me with B!!!!

3
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Thursday, Jun 06 2013

@ashakoorian839

That's why I was hesitant to get those lol. Who knows? I might have received the faulty one.

0
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Wednesday, Jun 05 2013

@sy2484832-Ah Yoo

I wouldn't get that. I read reviews that it breaks down easily. Get a watch with a bezel.

I'm not advocating you get the watch in the video (the tissot is like $1500 I think) but a simple plastic casio with a bezel would do just fine which is like $10-$15)

0
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Wednesday, Jun 05 2013

@monayli354

Meditate :D

And after that say to yourself "I will f$8k this test up!!!!!" while listening to some motivational music.

This is mines:

(caution: strong language)

4
PrepTests ·
PT137.S2.Q14
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Wednesday, Jun 05 2013

I see. Thanks

0
PrepTests ·
PT137.S4.Q11
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Tuesday, Jun 04 2013

I remember you mentioned something about LSAT using random ideas but still logically connecting them with one another and I think this question is a prime example. It was so hard at first to see that "appetite cannot be satisfied..." as the "gap".

I noticed that NA are a lot harder than the older test because of the most random ideas that produce the subtle gaps.

2
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Monday, Jun 03 2013

Hey everyone,

You can click on the persons name and "PM" them. This is a good way to start google hangouts/ skype if you feel hesitant about sharing your personal info/email publicly. This is how me and a couple other 7sagers got to do BR over GH, by PMing each other through here.

0
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Monday, Jun 03 2013

Keep doing the games over and over again until you feel like you're getting carpal tunnel and crying blood.

I'm kidding, but you should always try to do games that you had trouble with (finding all the inferences, shortcuts, etc.) over and over again.

3
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Monday, Jun 03 2013

http://classic.7sage.com/how-to-get-a-perfect-score-on-the-logic-games/

1
PrepTests ·
PT137.S2.Q14
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Monday, Jun 03 2013

aww shiznit! I see. "None of the plays will be popular several centuries from now "is the conclusion. And after that is the premise: the only ones that get to be performed regularly are the ones that do X. The drama critic may not know of the plays existence but still yet the play could fulfill criteria X.

I'm still a little dumbfounded on intervening time being a referential phrase though. Is it referring to the "century", or "decade"?

0
PrepTests ·
PT130.S4.Q15
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Monday, Jun 03 2013

Hey Sunyuchencn,

I think "attends" in this case means to "match up" or "meet our expectations".

The "simple arithmetical facts" gives us an example of the computer dependent proofs.

0
PrepTests ·
PT130.S4.Q18
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Monday, Jun 03 2013

Sure. I'll be sure to make a post there when I get the chance! Be sure to look for it soon :D

0
PrepTests ·
PT137.S2.Q18
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Sunday, Jun 02 2013

Is the "two or more" superfluous? I feel like you just needed "two objectionable characteristics".

2
PrepTests ·
PT130.S4.Q17
User Avatar
unhappymeal
Edited Tuesday, Sep 09 2025

Hey Sunyuchencn,

Necessary assumption answer choices can sometimes act like sufficient assumption answer choices in that they make a "bridge"

https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/how-to-find-necessary-assumptions-3/

Hope this helps!

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?