Hi all! I finally (and literally) bought into purchasing a prep course given my history with standardized exams. I self-studied for the MCAT a few years ago and did not do very well. I thought I could tackle the LSAT with Khan Academy, but once I started taking the PTs, I began to trend down from a 150 diagnostic. My goal was to take the June LSAT, but I'm almost 100% going to get a coupon and my hope is to a least take it by August (although I don't necessarily have to rush to take it by then, but would be ideal before I start my 40+/week fellowship). I normally study 4-5 hours/day and would like to keep it reasonable (have a life outside of LSAT)--any suggestions on prime amount of time to study? I know there's the study schedule generator, but it's suggesting I study 60+/week. I don't think that's feasible, but would like to hear more from others.
Has anyone been in a similar situation and can offer advice on how to use 7Sage having already had several months of self-study? Would love to hear from people who have been working with this for a few weeks at least, but any help would be appreciated! Thanks!
So from my understanding, and what JY explains in the video, is that any alternative explanations that can be blocked/eliminated/negated will strengthen an argument.
In strengthening and weakening questions, the LSAT will leave an argument with lots of gaps to be filled with assumptions. So, take D and make it so that it weakens the argument: natural habitats of amphibians have become smaller over the past century. My thoughts : oh so that could be the reason for decline in population #s and it is not the ozone layer affecting amphibians (therefore, weakening the argument). BUT because this AC is negated ( natural habitats of amphibians have NOT become smaller over the past century_) blocks it from being an alternative explanation that can weaken the argument.
The way I approach it is by defending the argument from any alternative explanations that can potentially weaken it.
Hope that helps!