So, if there is no review for PT 1-16; how are we going to learn from what are mistakes are. Or would it be best for me to not do any LR sections from PT 1-16?

Maybe it just doesn't work for a normal PC. Thank you I will try with my IPAD.

I am also near the Bronx. What date are we looking at?

I'd Love to join!

@harveylou1239 Thanks I definitely will do that. As for studying 24/7 I wish. But, with work my chances are slim to none. I do look forward to improving with the tidbits you’ve blessed me with! Thanks again!

@harveylou1239 you may have just unlocked all of my problems! I love all of you guys!

Checking in!

I’m with yah!

Hey! Thanks! I’ll start parsing it more instead of just assuming the conclusion key is the only one that helps. I wish you much success on this evil exam!

#help JY - I honestly did not know what “Altruistic” meant. Some questions I will get wrong just because I don’t know the word their using and I can’t google it until after. How can I become stronger?

#help ummm did anyone else think “clearly “ was the main conclusion and not the sub conclusion? If so, did you pick E as well. Not sure if these are subtle shifts I’m missing or whether I just don’t know how to identify conclusions yet.

Thank you for replying back shsina86. However, I somewhat follow your view over the other 7sager. For the simple fact that you don’t have to be a board member first. The whole objective is to be on the board. We don’t know that Murray is on a any board or not. The stimulus just tells us there’s a board that people like Muarry want to be on.

#help

D- I’m confused, JY you say D doesn’t matter. How so? Doesn’t that say what we are looking for? Or is there something I may not be understanding clearly from SA (Suff assumption) ?