I also had the same issue using Chrome, to fix it you will have to either disable all the chrome extensions and refresh page, or disable one by one to see which extension is the problem and refresh page after each.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtA7nXgXuTY

If you are facing difficulty watch this video, helped increase #of correct in SA questions

I was stuck on this from a previous question and chat gpt explaind to not make a comparative statement across time. Comparing across time can be misleading because contexts and standards change. Differences in history, technology, and values make accurate comparisons difficult. Both questions A and D are comparate and describe periods of time.

I was confused as well, but it helps to press on "See full diagram" in the previous lesson. The diagram helps explain the process of finding the missing rule. This technique is helpful for questions that ask you to identify the missing conditional rule.

This part did not come out to the way I wrote it

Negating either one, they still look the same but flipped

negate: truth

/T→/W

W→T

negate: written

W→T

/T→/W

• The only oral myths that have survived are the ones that were eventually written down.

-Uses group 1 because of the indicator "the only":

Group 1: if, when, where, all, every, any, the only: The idea immediately following the conditional indicator is the sufficient condition.

S→W

Contrapositive:/W→/S

• No myths would have been written down unless they contained truths that people wanted subsequent generations to remember.

-Uses group 3 because of the indicator "unless":

-Group 3: or, unless, until, without: Pick either idea, then negate that idea, then make that idea the sufficient condition. The other idea is the necessary condition.

/T→/W

Contrapositive: W→T

•However, it says in the rules to negate either clause and make it the necessary condition. So, what if I chose truths? This would then be:

If you chose truths: negate that idea, then make that idea the sufficient condition:

/T→/W

Contrapositive: W→T

If you chose written: negate that idea, then make that idea the sufficient condition:

"No myths would have been written down"=/W

//W→T, this would be W→T because the two // cancel out

Contrapositive: /T→/W

Negating either one, they still look the same but flipped

negate: truth negate: written

/T→/W W→T

Contrapositive: W→T /T→/W

*Sufficient condition goes on the left

*Necessary condition goes on the right

🙂Hope this helps, LMK if I made a mistake!