I can't stand the philosophical questions. i can get them right and not even fully understand why because tit always feels like the statement just circles in on itself.

am i the only one that feels like his reasoning behind this was a reaching?

This had nothing to do with causal relationships and the hypothesis content we just learned. The first question could have been another learning section itself, discussing language and grammar identifiers.

for anyone struggling with these questions i would like to recommend the may 7 2025 recorded class with henry ewing. I struggled badly with these questions and after watching that single class saw considerable improvement in deciphering these questions correctly and quickly.

is anyone else consistently having the problem of narrowing it down to 2 choices and always picking the wrong answer choice of the 2? this is so disheartening to fall for trap answers on every damn question.