This is just a clarification question because I got the answer right, but I'm confused about the wording. In this context, does "and" essentially function like "or"? The way I read it, something would need to satisfy both conditions in order to receive funding (or, in this case, fail to satisfy both conditions in order not to receive funding). Is that the correct interpretation, or does "and" mean something different here?

Answer choice B is not bad answer E is just a better answer because its content is more alluded to/involved in the stimulus. If that made any sense? hope that it helped someone out.

idky why but the level one questions are like level 5s for me and the level 5s are like level ones

lowkirkenually thought this question was a level five but anyways

They really need to bold the except lol

a little confused on question 5 because couldn't you also infer that some of the potions are beneficial? the explanation didnt make any sense because on the flip side you can also draw a reasonable and valid inference for not all the witches stuff being poisonous?

for question one could you also say /poachers -->relocated pandas prosper?

so question because I think this will help me out. if a sufficient condition is mentioned twice we would create like branch instead of a link?