- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
@PhoebeHopp Replacing the term with "Can be true at the same time as..." immediately let me see why this answer is correct. Thank you, Phoebe!
I understand why A-D are incorrect, but I do not understand why E) is correct. Specifically, the wording /phrase that is giving me trouble: "Is consistent with". Is there another recommended way to think about the phrase "Is consistent with"?
#help
#feedback
One of the best Flaw explanations. Especially when it was explained why E) was not correct. Thank you, J.Y. !
What are some correlation key words?
What are some causation key words?
#help
#feedback
Regarding answer choice A, is it appropriate to translate the answer using the "If A, then not B" translation for the quantifier "None"? So the translation would be, "If it is a coolest brown dwarf, it has NOT ever been hot enough to destroy lithium".
I intuitively did this translation in my head and after translating this, I negated the statement and saw that it weakened the argument.
Are these "No, Few, Not All" quantifier translations best served in other question types like Must be True?
#help
For those of you who struggled with this question, here are 2 very similar questions for studying: PT157.S3.Q21, PT148.S3.Q24
For those of you who struggled with this question, here are 2 very similar questions for studying: PT157.S2.Q22, PT157.S3.Q21
For those of you who struggled with this question, here are 2 very similar questions for studying: PT157.S2.Q22, PT148.S3.Q24
For those of you who struggled with this question, here is another very similar question that will help you study: PT157.S3.Q8
For those of you who struggled with this question, here is another very similar question that will help you study : PT135.S4.Q12
Yes. The class you're looking for is called "Advanced Conditional Reasoning" , usually led by Katie Volpert.
@Kevin_Lin Thank you so much for response. This was SO helpful!!!
At the 4:05 mark in this video, Kevin mentions the search box feature. He says he will cover the search box in future passage explanations - but I went through the reading comp. curriculum and I do not recall any time he references the search box. Can someone please let me know where he references this again? #help #feedback
I had the same issue as you. Starting a Wrong Answer Journal and highlighting/making a note of those key words helped me identify them when taking the timed practice exams, and pushed my score into 165.
Questions like these are a great reminder to spend time on your POE skills with a wrong answer journal. I got this correct, but I still don't understand it completely. POE saved the day.
This was an EXCELLENT explanation by Kevin. Everything clicked immediately , thank you for explaining the judgement.
Hi 7Sage, it would extremely helpful if our Priorities by Tag included sections and drills. After a lot of drilling and sections, I just noticed the priorities are not updating and it made me sad :(
#feedback The "Show Question" option on top of Lesson sections is broken and will not overlay the question. I've tried on multiple browsers.
Did you finish the core curriculum before your first official take? After I took my first official LSAT, I took a 2 month break from any LSAT specific studying. Afterwards, I reviewed the Foundations + LR by literally going lesson by lesson from the very beginning. It helped me understand concepts I may not have understood too well on my first time. It helped significantly.

I log any wrong answer or question I struggled with into my WAJ. I also note down the date that I got it wrong. I create a study set of 6-10 questions from my WAJ and I wait 30 days to review the set. If I get a question wrong again, I color code it red on my excel sheet, if I get it correct but struggled, I code it yellow. If I get it correct and didn't struggle, I code it green and don't review it ever again.