kind of confused why question 1 chooses "therefore Gerald" as the conclusion, I know therefore is a conclusion indicator but

"people who are red/green color blind cannot distinguid between green and brown?" seems more fitting?

Is the main disagreement that they have concern for the environment vs their own health?

Confused on section 2, question 2. How is A any better than E?

I am still not able to review my results? Anyone else?

Is anyone else not able to see their results from the drills?

Most of America's almonds are grown in California. Most produce from California are exported to Brazil. Therefore, some almonds are exported to Brazil. ( saying most not all, so we CAN’T CONFIRM that some of the almonds are also the ones that are exported.)

Is that right?

I get confused because when I see the unless I think negate and put as sufficient condition

No student is chosen for Gryffindor unless they exhibit bravery. Therefore, if a student exhibits bravery, they will be sorted to Gryffindor.

/bravery--> chosen for gryffindor?

Reading the comments I can see how Bravery is one of the things needed to get in, but not everything to be chosen for gryffindor.

? help

I am also a bit confused.

when we say x-wing some hyperdrive and the video explains that could be 0 x-wings could have hyper drives, but i thought some was anything above 0? at least starting at 1?

I am a bit confused on #5

I understand the " aware of high probability --> knowledge established" from the word "if"

but I thought it there is an "unless", we negate one side and use it as the sufficient?

So I put

believes it DOES exist ( aware of high prob --> knowledge established

?

I am confused with question #5.

I thought Only also meant (if) as a necessary condition?

So why did it start with Amenable first instead of 3+ months.

I thought it would be

Only(if) trees bloom for 3 or 4 months ---> amenable?

help lol