User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Thursday, Nov 30 2017

My last PT was last weekend. I haven't done well on my last two PTs (trying too many test-taking strategies, I think), so scores have been down a few points. This messes with my head, so I've decided no more this last week.

Instead, I drilled individual LR sections a few times, but I'm done with those now, too. I've come to enjoy LGs, so I'm only doing those these last few days. Some timed, some not. I plan do one or two Saturday morning before the test, to warm up my brain.

My test center is about an hour from me, so to ensure I get a good night's sleep and don't feel rushed the next morning, I got a hotel near the test center the night before. I can drive up after work tomorrow and have dinner, relax, and get a good sleep. The morning of the test, I plan to get up early enough to do my warm up puzzle, have a good breakfast, and take a brisk walk.

Right now I'm focused on the mental prep. Sleep, relaxation, de-stressing, reminding myself that I've got this.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Friday, Dec 22 2017

It's in your IRR (Item response report).

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Friday, Dec 22 2017

I just got mine.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Tuesday, Nov 21 2017

@ said:

The thing with strategy is it needs to work universally. Trying a strategy out the first time is always a bit rough, but the broader issue I see is just that your general strategy only works under certain conditions. Maybe doing the RC passages with the most questions is going to work sometimes. But on 82 it happens to be a really awful approach. You're correct to be afraid that this could happen on test day. Because your strategy is contingent on the whims of the test, it could. You need to find better section strategies that are more resilient to the many different contingencies you need to be prepared for. A strategy that works sometimes is a strategy that doesn't work.

Yes. I'm definitely leaving that one behind. Since RC isn't usually that bad for me to begin with, I'm just going to go back to doing them in order. I'll skip individual questions if I have to, but no more skipping around on entire passages for me.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Tuesday, Nov 21 2017

@ said:

Well there are a few things here that you can use to calm your self down!

1.) You tired a new skipping strategy. - Often when we try new things on a test, or we take an unorthodox approach, we will take a hit to our score. This is not because the strategy is not valuable or useful, but rather because we are not use to it. You were not taking this PT in your "normal" way it sounds like, which can account for some drop in score. THIS ISN'T BAD! It means you're still learning what works best for you.

An anecdote for you - prior to the September LSAT I refused to do a skipping strategy. Every time I tried I saw a decrease in my score. @ @ @ and a few other people told me that I had to skip if I wanted to improve. I just wouldn't listen. After struggling for a long time I finally started to skip. After I got use to it my scores started to improve a ton, turns out they were all right. I just had to spend time getting use to what I was doing!

2.) This test was hard for a lot of people. While the LSAT is consistent and the same but the difficulty fluctuates for individuals. It can be a lot of things, burnout, not focused, tired, the list goes on. It takes a lot of things to go right to preform our best, and it sounds like you might have just had a hiccup.

3.) Hard tests are the best thing that can happen to us. It is a chance to learn. You did really well on your BR so it tells me that the material wasn't hard for you. What was hard was timing, the way you approached the test, mental blocks, stress and things like this. This is where you need the work! It's a chance to get better!

You have totally got this!

Thank you! This really helps put things in perspective.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Tuesday, Nov 21 2017

Thank you all, especially for the perspective on trying a new strategy. It was literally the first time I'd tried it (having just listened to the webinar about it the day before). I think what I'm going to try before the test in Dec is taking timed LR sections using that strategy so that I can get more confident in it. I'm usually pretty happy with my RC and LG scores. It's LR that brings my overall score down. I can squeeze in a lot more timed sections between now and then, than I can full tests (though I will take my final PT next weekend).

That BR really did make me happy because I've been working a lot the last couple weeks on honing my skills in certain problem areas, and I this was the first BR I'd done since doing so.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Tuesday, Nov 21 2017

@ said:

In the last 2 weeks strategy can net you more points than "drilling types" like Sami mentioned are you skipping? Consistently? Are you doing things how you normally do them? How do you bubble?

Basically are you taking the test how you practice?

Focusing on HOW you take the test is just... maybe even MORE important than your problem based knowledge.

I've cost myself 10 points, 7 points and 4 points on tests in single sections all via costly mistakes usually missbubbles or letting a section get in my head or issues with not setting my clock right.

Had 0 to do with my knowledge of answering LSAT questions.

I'm spending my last 2 weeks on consistent bubbling practices, skipping strategies and deliberately putting sections that undermine my confidence into PTs (or entirely comprised of them) to get me to a point that I don't have these issues.

At this point it's not a lack of LSAT knowledge keeping me from getting my goal score... it's me getting in my own way.

I think this is where I'm at, too. There are still a couple types of questions (if they are particularly difficult) that I struggle with. But I do feel I have the basics there. It's now time that I struggle with, and test-taking strategies. I believe that skipping works, but I struggle with it a lot. So I'm spending this last bit of time trying to hone those test-taking skills to make sure I'm in control of the time.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Tuesday, Nov 21 2017

@ said:

So I took the Sept. test and scored 5 points higher than the latest 3 PTs I took before it.... so make sure to be calm and eat properly the day of the test :)

oh god, if that happened to me it would change all of my target school lol

I just assume I will score about 3 points lower than my PTs and try to get my PTs to a place that will account for that and still get me the score I hope for.

User Avatar

Tuesday, Nov 21 2017

wordbaubles464

Not sure what to think.

I took PT 82 last weekend and totally blew it. I choked on one whole LG section (in that it took forever) and then had less time to spend on the others (plus, I got several wrong on the one I choked on). I'd decided to do the RC that had the most questions first, since while I do reasonably well on RC, I always seem to have to rush through the last one because it often has a lot of questions. Well the RC with the most questions on this test was the judge one, and so that messed me up, too. I basically ran out of time to one whole RC section.

I was also trying a skipping strategy, but that just got blown out of the water.

I normally PT around 163-164 now, pretty consistently, but this one was a 158. My BR Scores have been going up and on the 163/164 PTs I usually BR around 169. BUT on this 158 test I BRd at 177!

I was pretty happy with that and part of me thinks maybe I just had a bad day and the BR is proof that my actual score would have been higher on another test.

So I don't know whether to be pleased overall about the BR, or down about the 158.

The only way to know for sure is to take another PT, but ugh. That drop and experience on PT 82 was bad. So now I"m freaking out that I could run into the same thing on the actual test day.

I'm sure I'm not the only one freaking out. I just needed to vent to people who will understand :/

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Monday, Nov 19 2018

@ said:

@ said:

I thought it was easier than June and July. June’s RC destroyed me. I thought this one was a very typical LSAT. It’s also totally possible that I was just more prepared for this one after 8 months of studying. But it also seemed easier than the September test, which I didn’t sit for, but I did a PT on it.

This is tricky because we are all so vulnerable to bias from our stages of prep, mood, and perception of how we scored. From what I have seen in this thread, on Reddit, and from my own experience, the consensus seems to be a tough LG due to the Mining game, 2 Average LR sections, and a relatively easy RC. Obviously anecdotal evidence like this is weak at best, however, speculation like this is the only thing keeping me sane until 12/8.

This was my perception of it. I struggle with LGs anyway, but the mining game totally threw me. I skipped it and went to the last one, but by the time I was done with that I had little to no time left for the mining game and just guessed everything except the first question. Felt that the LRs were pretty standard and I I finished without rushing at the end like I often do. My experimental was LR, though, and I do remember one being harder than the others; I just don't remember which one it was! RC is always good for me, and I felt good about this one, even the movie one (though it was the toughest).

Hopefully my feeling about this test is correct (that I hit my target). I've been wrong before. I thought I completely tanked the first one I took a year ago, but got a 158 (not as good as I'd hoped, but ok). Then I took September's test as a PT on Friday. My dogs barked through the entire thing [literally!] and I was super annoyed and struggled with the LGs and got a 161 LOL If I did worse on Saturday than the dog-barking PT on Friday, I may just give up ;)

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Saturday, Nov 17 2018

I found the LGs hard, but they are never my strong suit. The mining question threw me. Other than the first ? I guessed on most of that game. I do well on RC usually and felt this one went well, though I got a bit short on time on the last one, so who knows. I felt pretty good about the LRs, but one was definitely harder than the other 2 (I had 3 LRs) and I have no idea which one that was. It’s all a blur.

I don’t think I did worse than my previous one (158) but I’m hoping it was enough to break 160, my goal. Just no idea at this point.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Thursday, Dec 13 2018

Same here (but not URM). I also have a 161. I find it encouraging but don’t put a lot of hopes on it :) the highest ranked waiver so far is Penn. It’s nice to save some $$ when applying, though.

Edit: I do have a high GPA, over 75th percentile at almost every school. But it wasn’t until I broke 160 on the Nov exam that I started to get waivers for the top 20.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Tuesday, Dec 12 2017

I got it. I'm probably throwing off their results, since it was not at all geared toward a 48-year-old woman who graduated college 23 years ago.

I started at a 155 diagnostic. Now regularly test low 160s. BR is usually upper 160s. I've been putting in 20-30 hours a week since May (in addition to a full-time job and business; I'm a non-traditional student). I started with another LSAT online prep course and did the majority of my training there, but discovered 7Sage when looking for video explanations of the logic games (thanks for those, by the way!). Now signed up here as of 2 weeks ago. I've gone through all the videos for LR and that's helped me move up those points into the low 160s. I know I am capable of more, and that I just need more time to practice and bring up my speed. I discovered 7Sage too late. I'm making steady progress now, but not fast enough for the test on Saturday :/

I feel that upper 160s is reachable for me for sure, even above 170. I'm aiming for higher ranked law schools, but at the very least want a high score for the $$ when considering lower-ranked school. My GPA (graduated 1994) is a 3.94.

So my question: If I know that I'm going to probably score in the low 160s, and that I could do better on the December test, should I even bother with the Sept. one? Will law schools care if there are scores of (say) 161 and 169? or would a single 169 be better?

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Tuesday, Sep 11 2018

Yes, I did the same :) After starting I realized that 7Sage was for me, and upgraded to ultimate. (I'll be 50 when I start law school next year -- welcome!)

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Tuesday, Sep 11 2018

Thanks, everyone! You gave me some ideas on how to proceed. Appreciate it!

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Monday, Sep 10 2018

@ said:

wait can someone explain the curve? like if PS is predicting -10 curve does that mean everyone gets 10 points free? I don't get it and had no idea there was possibility of a curve on the LSAT LOL

Curve means how many you can get wrong and still score 170. A -10 curve means you can get 10 wrong and score a 170.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Monday, Sep 10 2018

I would not want to rely on it entirely. I started with PowerScore, then moved to 7Sage (which was the most helpful for me). I also use Khan, but mostly just for another perspective. Sometimes I get little "Aha!" moments that bring things into focus for me, because sometime you just need something explained a different way for it to make sense. But 7Sage is my go-to.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Saturday, Nov 10 2018

thanks! I think I figured it out. Appreciate the link as well.

User Avatar

Monday, Sep 10 2018

wordbaubles464

Personal statement: topic opinion?

Hi everyone. I'd like to get some thoughts about the topic of my personal statement. I have two potential ones in mind, and would love some opinions.

Background: I am a nontraditional student. I will be 50 when I start law school in 2019. I have been to law school before: I finished two years back in 1997-1999, before I decided to leave under financial pressure (from now ex-husband) combined with having one toddler and another baby on the way. Now that both kids are grown (youngest starts college this month), I am going back to law school because it is unfinished business, and all I've ever really wanted to do is be a lawyer. Before, when I was in law school, I pictured myself in a courtroom winning cases and being brilliant (ha). Now, after being a mom, and having both my kids be transgender, I'm very focused on wanting to focus on LGBT issues and civil rights.

Topic 1: my kids being transgender and how that has inspired my return to law school. Pro: it very much fits the overall theme of my application. Con: it's actually a very big topic to try to address in 2 page and still make the kind of impact a personal statement should make (?) There's no one moment or story to tell. I could address this in other places, such as a "Why X" statement (I'm looking at schools that have LGBT journals and/or clinics or other programs), and/or an addendum that explains my years away from work and school. So it's not like it will go unaddressed entirely.

Topic 2: This is the one my gut is telling to write, even though it doesn't speak to WHY I want to go to law school at my age. It's about how, after getting divorced and feeling very "not me," I picked the scariest, most difficult sounding trip in a travel brochure and went to Nepal to go trekking in 2004. I wanted to be out of my comfort zone and challenge myself, and to remember what it was like to feel successful. I'd never been trekking before and was out of shape. The Annapurna circuit is nothing but steps, and this incident is about how I got so far behind my group one day, that I just wanted to give up. I wanted to just lie down on the side of the trail and quit. And then it started pouring, and we (myself and the poor porter who spoke no English but had to stay with me) ended up on some random woman's front step, next to her chickens, while I fought off hypothermia. I had a moment of realizing that there was no giving up: no one was going to come get me; there were no cars to call up there, or any way for find an alternate way out. I had to just suck it up and keep going. And I did.

So I think topic 2 is much better personal statement material, and says a lot about me. But it doesn't tie in with my overall application theme.

Thoughts?

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Thursday, Nov 09 2017

I graduated in '94 also! Hey, fellow NTS :)

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Saturday, Dec 08 2018

They release scores in waves, not all at once. Hopefully you have it soon!

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Saturday, Dec 08 2018

I just got mine (very happy, made my goal). I saw it on the website first then got email about 2 minutes later.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Tuesday, Nov 07 2017

I'm 700 or so since May (estimate).

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Tuesday, Nov 07 2017

@ said:

@ Since you have the U+ account, you already have access to PT 82:

https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/preptest-82/

Others can purchase it here as an add-on:

https://classic.7sage.com/addons/

We generally release new PTs a few weeks after they're released to the students to took that PT. If you have a U+ account, those PTs are automatically added to your account.

oops. I guess I should have looked first! Thanks.

User Avatar

Friday, Dec 07 2018

wordbaubles464

Encouragement for older students

I've been out of college for almost 25 years. Getting LORs was a bit of a challenge, as all my professors have since retired and are travelling or don't check their official emails very often. Of my first two choices, one said she was travelling for the foreseeable future and wouldn't be able to write one for me; the other hasn't replied. With that in mind I approached two others, and was so pleasantly surprised to find that both remembered me well, even though I'd only had a couple classes with them 25 years ago, and both were very encouraging and overjoyed to write me LORs.

One of them mentioned a paper I'd written that "revised, corrected, and refined a theory" of hers regarding a certain novel. I don't even remember this! So don't assume that just because you've been out of school for a while (or even a LONG while) that professors won't remember you. It doesn't hurt to ask, and you may be surprised :)

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Tuesday, Jun 05 2018

I graduated high school in 1987, college in 1994, and will be 50 when I start law school :)

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Sunday, Dec 03 2017

There was a guy in my group who had 6 highlighters of various colors and at least 2 dozen pencils. I really wondered if he used all the highlighters but was too busy to watch obviously.

Older guy in front/left of me finished every section at least 5 minutes early. Not sure if he’s a super genius or over confident.

User Avatar
wordbaubles464
Sunday, Dec 03 2017

I’m really down about today. I was really confident going in and felt the first two sections went ok (RC and LR)..a little short of time at the end of each and had to rush a little, but nothing horrible. Then I got the LG section with the floors and it just went south. I probably only got about half of that whole section. When I saw the second LG after the break (fruit one) I was happy, thinking the first one had to be the experimental. I did better on the second one but not as well as I’d like. Last LR was ok.

Disappointed that the 1st LG was the real one. I have no idea how I did overall, but suspect I’m going to be unhappy. Ugh

User Avatar

Wednesday, Nov 01 2017

wordbaubles464

Where can I find Substitution Equivalence lesson?

I was reviewing game 4 of preptest 81 and for question 23 JY mentioned the “core curriculum on substitution equivalence.” I’m on the cusp of understanding what he means with the knock out/sneak in test, but I need a little more. I can’t find the discussion listed as such in the core and assume it’s part of another lesson. Anyone know where so I don’t have to watch them all again? ? thank you!

Confirm action

Are you sure?