@

What about it?

Just finished mine. I had two RC. LG, RC, LR, RC.

LG: summer camp, musicians, clay tablets, designers. Found it super easy. game 4 was little challenging at first, but after a couple of minutes I think I cracked it. Had over 5 minutes left, which I have never had before, and LG is my strong suite.

Seems like this was the real one, so I think a lot of you can rest easy lol.

RC1: was Nigerian Languages. I found it a little challenging. I would say 7/10 on difficulty. I think this is the real one because I have seen it so much on here.

LR: was straight forward. Nothing to crazy. I remember have monkey tokens questions.

RC2: was easy than the first, I would say 4-5/10. Nothing to tough. Mandatory disclosers was one of the topics.

@ It seemed yesterday it switched between lunch time (central time zone) so aruond 12-1ish. I would expect the same happens today, although its LSAC, so who knows. lol. I take it at 2 so I'll comment after that.

I take it this afternoon, but from what I can tell from watching this forum like a hawk, is that the Real LG is standard, same with the LR that is scored, and the real RC is the Nigerian language one which most people have said is fairly difficult. For the people this morning can you give more detail about the two LG so we can try to figure out which one is experimental?

@ I haven't heard that. I hope they don't. To me that is what makes the lsat different than other test. But yes, 2 RC is worst nightmare for sure.

I would think that saying that starting a business and focusing on that business caused your grades to slip would be a bad look. Shows that you weren't able to handle the requirements that both entail. However, if you could write about how you've learned from that experience I could see how that would be a good thing in front of an admissions rep.

@ I'm really hoping so. I could see LSAC having a stock pile of LR already since there used to be two sections per test, but a second LG would make sense. My preferred would be two LGs for sure.

@ I thought the scoring scale was based on each variation of the test given, which I assumed meant each month the test was administered. I.E. the August 2021test was all the same, then October would be different. Not that August 14 was different than august 15, etc.

Again, I could be completely wrong.

@ If they change the scored sections, then the scoring scale wouldn't be truly fair, would it? I know the experimental can be different for every person, but I don't understand how they could be different scoring sections. Unless they have a way of determining different sections as equal levels of difficulty, then substituting equal level sections for each other, but that is just me. I could be wrong.

Two RCs is the situation I am dreading the most. Just seems like it would be the most mentally draining for me.

I faired the same. Pretesting in the low 160s, scored in the low 150s. I had two RC, and I though the RC was my hardest sections. Overall, I thought RC was tough, LR was average, and LG was easy, but apparently I was wrong. Now trying to figure out if I want to take it again or not.