- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
@sbs266142 said:
@luongcody297 understanding what you can and cannot control helped me relax, sleep, and stay calm. You have studied hard, put in the work, and exhausted yourself preparing for this exam; you've done all you can control.
The content on the exam is out of your control. While uncertainty is nerve-wracking, you have taken the steps necessary within your control to prepare. You are not simply taking the LSAT tomorrow, you are attacking it. You've studied and created strategies to set the conditions for yourself to win. While you don't know the exact questions you're going to see, you are taking the test on your terms thanks to the preparation, not the LSATs. You're well prepared and should be confident in your preparation and yourself. You can do this.
This is so great. Really appreciate these kind words!
Guys, I have now considered it a given that I won't be able to sleep well the night before the test day. Any previous advice on how to sleep tight before the test day would be much appreciated! Also, when is the June test ready for registration?
#help Is the correct answer choice basically saying: it was the actual amount of laugh that made the difference, not the tendency to laugh?
When can we actually discuss the questions in the January Flex???
This episode is so encouraging... especially under the current circumstances. Really look forward to learning which school is Sami going to attend!
This section alone has four weaken questions!!! I don't think i've ever had a section with so many flaw and weaken questions together... anyway, since JY's explanation videos are not available yet, I want to put these confusing ones out here for discussion:
Q22
Premise: (because) if we want to know medieval epi includes some claims, we just ask whether any epi believe it. If they did, then it is part of medieval epi; if they didn't then the opposite is part of medieval epi.
Conclusion: The solution to define medieval epistemology simply as the epistemological beliefs of the medieval epistemologists.
The correct AC is E, however I feel like E is weakening the premise. since we're supposed to weaken the support in this type of questions, I'm not sure E does that and also this argument feels like circular reasoning to me. Please feel free to point out any problems in my breakdown of the argument.
Q24
premise: if pollen from a drug-producing crop flies into a nearby non-drug-producing crop of the same species, the drug could fertilize and turn it into a drug-producing crop.
conclusion: genetically engineered crop raises the possibility that drug will end up in the general food supply.
I chose E for this question, becuz i think E provides that even though X happens, doesn't mean Y will necessarily ensue (X, not Y).
Similar to Q22, I find the correct answer choice D to weaken the premise, instead of the support.
@sinanaseri5969 This is a very quick way to get over Q14 & thanks again for taking the time to explain it! I think this is the first time I learned about this method, since JY doesn't use it at all... I'm really surprised how efficient this is! Thank you!
@sinanaseri5969 said:
@pfryfogle1735 said:
@sinanaseri5969 said:
@kim329 I took the test last week. Let me know which questions you need explanations on and I can do my best to explain. I'm writing the Nov test too
For Section 2 LG #3, could you go through how you solved it? I missed 15,16,17 when I took the test, but then when I went to review I got them correct but I'm still feeling like I have a loose understanding of this game. Is it an In/Out? with repeating elements? I'm definitely missing some inferences! I'm sitting for the NOV test and this has me spooked!
Here's game three. Let me know if you guys have any questions. Hope it helps a bit
@pfryfogle1735 @hhawkinberry577 @wuyongxiao257
@sinanaseri5969 thank you so much the explanation helped a lot. However I didn't quite follow the first method you mentioned for Q14, where you said to look for the ones that could cause trouble... it'd be great if you could pinpoint that link! Thank you!
@kashibrandi609 said:
7Sage usually takes 30-60 days to post explanation videos of new exams. It’ll come eventually just have to be patient! Here are some other discussions regarding this.
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/comment/164312
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/comment/164197
Thanks a lot for letting me know!!!
@pfryfogle1735 said:
@sinanaseri5969 said:
@kim329 I took the test last week. Let me know which questions you need explanations on and I can do my best to explain. I'm writing the Nov test too
For Section 2 LG #3, could you go through how you solved it? I missed 15,16,17 when I took the test, but then when I went to review I got them correct but I'm still feeling like I have a loose understanding of this game. Is it an In/Out? with repeating elements? I'm definitely missing some inferences! I'm sitting for the NOV test and this has me spooked!
I have the same feeling..... Could really use some help on this game!!!
I feel that ALL three sections are more difficult than the previous PTs... It'd be very helpful to have explanation videos on them!
#help The way I interpret Terrence's point is that, due to his books' wide audience appeal, he should be given due credit for his literary achievement. However this is not what Terrence meant obviously... Where did I go wrong???
#help "The conclusion of the argument is most strongly supported if which one of the following is assumed..." Why do I feel like this is a necessary assumption Q yet worded like a sufficient assumption Q??? I'm very confused about this Q type...
#help Does the "narrative" in Q22 mean telling a story? Is that what "narrative" mean when it's an adjective?
Somehow I found this passage more manageable than the pigeon science article...
@andywsoccer421 said:
I surfed around a bit, and according to people's reply on reddit, it's not possible/not allowed. Knew it was too good to be true..
I heard of people taking the July Flex in Asia tho, and it seems their scores were not cancelled or anything.
#help I thought (B) in Q12 was saying the legal scholars wanted to eradicate "such abstract discourse" with alternative narrative. Is it not correct in answering this question?
#help BRing this passage and realized that I couldn't figure out author's objection of the climatic stability hypotheses, namely Line34-41.
Could someone help me understand why local competition doesn't account for the latitudinal gradient? Thanks!!!
#help why does franchise here mean vote? or how are we supposed to know that?
It is so weird that the way I look at (B) is that it's ruling out an alternative explanation. I thought that "unusual levels of unrest" could be another cause leading to the "decline and fall of Rome". But it seems to be the same thing as "decline and fall of Rome" right? Also I see why (D)is the ultimate correct answe choice, but (B) under time pressure just seems so cookie-cutter!