just a heads up that the timestamp for this lesson is 4m not 1m :)
i was really confused between c) and e), as a psych grad i picked c) because duh. but the more i thought about it the more i found e) to be right.
c) being wrong because it doesn't address that the argument can be weakened through offering a differing hypothesis. even through listening generalizability, it opens up too much interpretation and assumptions
e) does do that address a weak point in the argument and counteracts it through giving evidence for the cause and effect relationship between snoring and throat abnormalities.
im scoring in the 140 range on pts (both low and high) and plan on taking the LSAT in jan. call me crazy but i have already applied to canadian law schools so the jan test is my one and only try. high stakes.
anyone wanna team up and hold each other accountable by being study buddies? or in a study gc? 3+ is a crowd
the timestamp is incorrect here too, instead of 1m it is more like 8m :)