#feedback This video is very helpful! However the video is 7 minutes long and the lesson says it will only take 1 minute. Additionally I have watched this video 2-3 times and pressed the arrow onto the next lesson but 7sage is still not registering that I have completed this lesson.
Earlier video JY said Principle Questions are quite different from Pseudo Sufficient Assumption Questions. But now JY says they are basically mirror questions?
I'm taking my LSAT tomorrow (The practice test have me from 160-165)
This is my first time realizing that Sufficient assumption and Necessary assumption questions are called what they are called because of the relationship between Necessary and Sufficient.
I like this check in! It's also really helpful that I took multiple LSATs before embarking on all this curriculum so at least I recognize those questions that made no sense to me then and now can see like "oh great now I see why I need to learn this concept I remember seeing it"
It's basically a question of what level of abstraction is being used to analyze the argument. That is certainly a very imporant skill to have in legal work!
I am trying to view/download the pdf and my screen just shows up as blank when I click the link. It could be my computer but wanted to flag this in case it's not
Confused about why some questions use " most strongly supported" but fall into multiple categories. An example being how MSS and Strengthen questions have identical stems but are considered to be in different categories? #help
I would order the hierarchy differently. Argument Labeling -> Argument Description -> Argument Description & Analysis -> Argument Engagement and Analysis; Non-Argument
Is there a way we can 'like' or 'thumbs-up' this video? I'm so tempted to 'like' a video after I finish it lol.
6
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
101 comments
found description a lot easier to do than engagement and analysis
is there a cheat sheet anywhere listing these LR question stems w/ examples?
thanks!
Love when JY said weakening is to "punch the argument in the face", lol.
everyone got this mwah now onto rc which I am the most scared of ( I'm a slow reader) prayers
Chat, we finished LR. It is time to LOCK IN.
#feedback This video is very helpful! However the video is 7 minutes long and the lesson says it will only take 1 minute. Additionally I have watched this video 2-3 times and pressed the arrow onto the next lesson but 7sage is still not registering that I have completed this lesson.
Earlier video JY said Principle Questions are quite different from Pseudo Sufficient Assumption Questions. But now JY says they are basically mirror questions?
I feel like it’s finally clicking for me…
I'm taking my LSAT tomorrow (The practice test have me from 160-165)
This is my first time realizing that Sufficient assumption and Necessary assumption questions are called what they are called because of the relationship between Necessary and Sufficient.
S -> N.
I feel dumb
#help
I don't remember learning necessary assumption type question.
I followed all the curriculum up to now, did I miss the part where it explains necessary assumption type of question?
What's the difference between necessary assumption type and sufficient assumption type?
I like this check in! It's also really helpful that I took multiple LSATs before embarking on all this curriculum so at least I recognize those questions that made no sense to me then and now can see like "oh great now I see why I need to learn this concept I remember seeing it"
It's starting to make sense now that the road is set
Could someone help me by identifying the differences between necessary and sufficient assumptions? #help (Added by Admin)
Paused the video to come up with my own parallel argument to the Socrates one and coincidentally used Charlie in my parallel argument too lol
Please help what is the PDF password so I can print #help
It's basically a question of what level of abstraction is being used to analyze the argument. That is certainly a very imporant skill to have in legal work!
I am trying to view/download the pdf and my screen just shows up as blank when I click the link. It could be my computer but wanted to flag this in case it's not
What's the difference between Argument Part (Main Point) questions and Labeling questions? #help
Is this something we should memorize?
#help (Added by Admin)
Confused about why some questions use " most strongly supported" but fall into multiple categories. An example being how MSS and Strengthen questions have identical stems but are considered to be in different categories? #help
Wondering if anyone finds the arg. engagement & analysis to be harder than parallel & description?
I actually feel like the argument description is necessary for engagement & analysis, rather than the other way around.
Wow so fricken cool.. I love this video… I feel like I'm part of a secret group that just unlocked the LSAT secrets lmaooooo
Admin Note: removed all caps
Excellent bird's eye view of LR
I would order the hierarchy differently. Argument Labeling -> Argument Description -> Argument Description & Analysis -> Argument Engagement and Analysis; Non-Argument
Is there a way we can 'like' or 'thumbs-up' this video? I'm so tempted to 'like' a video after I finish it lol.