Premise 1: benefit constituents → consider consequences

Conclusion: × benefit constituents

Premise 2: concerned with careers → repugnance or enthusiasm

Logic Chain:

Assumption → × consider the consequences → × benefit constituents

(A): benefit constituents → less concerned with careers

(D): repugnance or enthusiasm → × consider the consequences

Anthropologists: survived → involved the ability to cope with diverse natural environment

To prove false: survived → involved the ability to cope with diverse natural environment

Author: thrived in a diverse array of environments, but became extinct (survived)

Why didn't JY analyze the last sentence "Preserving old buildings..." in the stimulus? Can't it be a flaw that only a reason for something can justify a solution by itself? That is to say, it might be an impediment to new development, but it still has historic value so that you can not decide to demolish them merely because of the impediment reason.

#help (Added by Admin)

Therapist: direct is more effective than undirect;

D: indirect needs direct to be effective.

The fourth painting, the Father (1980) by Luo Zhongli, is really famous in China, says my mom while seeing it just now.

Any Chinese 7Sagers here? Does this passage make you think a lot while getting a sense of familiarity or intimacy? Maybe not, and that is understandable since the story was about our parents' and grandparents' generations.

How can we join the group? And by what means the meeting will be held, online?

(E) Showing that something that would be impossible if a particular thesis were correct is actually true.

Premise 1: If a particular thesis were correct, something would be impossible.

Premise 2: Something is actually true.

Conclusion: The particular thesis is not correct.

Premise 1: If appearance alone entirely determines whether or not something is considered a work of art were correct, Warhol's Brillo Boxes is considered a work of art would be impossible.

Premise 2: Warhol's Brillo Boxes is considered a work of art is actually true.

Conclusion: Appearance alone entirely determines whether or not something is considered a work of art is not correct. (Stimulus)

Do not dislike → kind → prosper

Dislike → respect & not fully content

Must be false?

(A) Some people who like each other are not fully content in each other's presence.

(B) Some people who are fully content in each other's presence do not want each other to prosper. (fully content → do not dislike → prosper)

(C) Some people who treat each other with respect are not fully content in each other's presence.

(D) Some people who want each other to prosper dislike each other.

(E) Some people who are kind to each other do not treat each other with respect.