- Joined
- Oct 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
@Gokies23 you're so right. this test is so inconsistent with its phrasing of "no outside knowledge is required". i was able to get this question based off of POE, but its still a very tricky one
Same lol. Not sure if this the reaction you wanted but know you're not alone. Your hardwork will 1000000% pay off. Just make sure not to get into your own head about it. many people say that the actual exam is easier. Telling you this is also helping me get out of my own head. This exam is a monster, any progress or good score is an amazing feat and you should be proud! Good luck on your exam, I'm sure you're gonna do great!
I'm sorry, how is this a level four but question 23 is level 3? Someone really needs to rework these levels or i just gotta lock in
Lord have mercy. This is kinda a flaw question as well. Basically C is right because "the argument takes for granted that coffee is the baseline." Maybe 10 is the baseline, and coffee was double that, not that 20 is the baseline and 10 is half
lsat: do not make unnecessary assumptions. Also LSAT: here are 5 random assumptions you needed to make
maybe im just dumb lol
bruh. why was this section in general so much harder than most? Not know what an LP is made me get it wrong. What happened to not needing outside information to get the questions wrong? Am I just stupid or is there really something missing? I know its a level two question but its just weird man...
lsac just hates us. I got it right but the fact that i wasted so much time on this question is sooooo ridiculous
@Misque i actually couldnt stop thinking about it as soon as i read it. I really need to get off my phone lol
took me way longer than it should have. i got it after actuallying "codependents or their council" which is when i chose C bc they need a lawyer. I need to slow down fr
Thats actually insane man congrats! Do you have any tips on how to get such a high score? I hope you dont mind me asking but ive been studying for nearly six months (granted not very consistently) and i almost crossed the 160s but then i went back down. Did you have a specific study plan/schedule?
@FelipeCaceres-Cambero craziest and stupidest assumption ever that essentially, the more people that live from serious injuries, the more the country can make from those survivors in the work force.
this question almost got me because i kept second guessing myself, its literally so stupid.
@astorialovescake The assumption is basically asking us what's not going to weaken the argument. The conclusion states that it IS some other gaseous substance. The only AC that challenges that is the argument for body heat. Which means the argument assumes it CANNOT be body heat.
"If you're telling the truth, I won't expose you. UNLESS I'm ordered to". The conclusion says she will expose even if it's true, which means she was ordered to.
@DannySmall a win is a win lol