I have heard different perspectives on this topic. I am in a bit of a tug o war in my head since I know that the earlier they receive the app the better.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
OK, I got 2, 3, and 7 wrong. But I am taking my time on this lesson to fully understand why I got them wrong.
I want to make sure I understand this correctly. In an argument, there is a premise and a conclusion. The premise supports the conclusion, and the conclusion receives support from the premise. For the LSAT, support "increases the likelihood of the truth," and the order of the premise and conclusion doesn't matter in an argument. The premise might come first, with the conclusion last, or vice versa.
I am on the same boat and this won't be my first time. I think taking as much time as possible is best.
This confused me. I think the elaboration is a bit wordy and I can't seem to get everything that I am reading to stick.
I think I am understanding it but I cannot grasp how we determine if the "and" or "or" goes in the sufficient or necessary condition. #help
I got this one wrong. But I can see now why C is the correct answer. I chose D, and I can see that this answer choice is irrelevant to the argument. I am feeling frustrated I am not getting any better at this although I am understanding it clearer and clearer I can't seem to get my answer choices correct.
I love A and B the most.
Assumptions can support the argument into a weaker or stronger argument.
Main takeaway is that Weakening questions focuses on the support between the premise and the conclusion to thin out or "weaken" the support between the two.