User Avatar
yunglean2005
Joined
Nov 2025
Subscription
Core
User Avatar
yunglean2005
5 days ago

10/15, 12/15 on Blind Review

2
User Avatar

Wednesday, Dec 31 2025

yunglean2005

💪 Motivated

144->151

Took my first Prep Test about a month ago and got a 144. Today I took my second one and received 151. While it is low it is closer to my goal of 165+. I plan on taking the LSAT in April. Any tips to improve my score?

8
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Tuesday, Dec 16 2025

5/5. last one felt tricky.

2
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Thursday, Dec 11 2025

@kimwexler Good luck with your studying with effort and time I'm sure you'll get better.

1
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Tuesday, Dec 09 2025

@kimwexler what score did you get?

1
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Tuesday, Dec 09 2025

cause when you're with me my enemies will never win. Please do more Dragon Ball references instead of having questions about shrimp species...

6
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Wednesday, Dec 03 2025

4/5 on the first try. 5/5 on blind review. Should have trusted my gut on number 2.

2
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Saturday, Nov 29 2025

What has made this easier for me is realizing that all is not the same as only. All refers to everything of a certain group. Only is more strict about the rules.

All dogs drink water. Other animals can drink water too.

ONLY dogs drink water. No other animals drink water.

3
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Tuesday, Nov 25 2025

@Carolinechichester I start off by identifying the Subject and Action in the rule.

Opera Companies: Subject

Action: Produce the most popular operas

Add this together to get the rule.

Rule: Opera companies have to produce the most popular operas or Opera Companies-->Produce the most popular operas.

Now I search for the exception which is usually after UNLESS.

Exception: they receive funding from the National Endowment for the Arts.

Separating it into Rule=Subject+Action makes it easier for me.

1
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Tuesday, Nov 25 2025

A team who won the NBA finals must have scored more during regular time or scored more in overtime.

Won the NBA Finals--> (Scored more during Regular time OR scored more in Overtime)

Won the NBA Finals--> (/Score more during Regular time--> Scored more in Overtime)

Won the NBA finals-->(/Score more in Overtime--> Scored more in Overtime)

Pulling the embedded sufficient condition would be

Won the NBA Finals AND /Score more during Regular time--> Scored more in Overtime

Won the NBA Finals AND /Score more in Overtime--> Scored more during Regular time

This method makes it easier to identify the options that lead to a conclusion.

1
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Edited Monday, Dec 01 2025

Got confused on 6. I assumed that a center that has less than 10% adoption rate may be eligible was part of the Lawgic formula. Is there any tips for avoiding tricks like this?

3
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Friday, Nov 21 2025

Validity does not equal to truth. However, if all premises are true then the conclusion must be true. This makes an argument valid. An invalid argument depends on the truth of the premises.

2
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Friday, Nov 21 2025

Every conditional argument is valid? Does that also make every conditional argument true?

2
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Friday, Nov 21 2025

I'm interested. I plan on taking it in April 2026.

1
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Wednesday, Nov 19 2025

@rjon27 Same thing happened to me. I assumed that the conclusion was a fact and did not need any questioning. Led me to think there was no argument.

2
User Avatar
yunglean2005
Tuesday, Nov 18 2025

jay is a diabetic and gets low blood pressure. He eats a chocolate bar once a day. Ray leaves a chocolate bar in his bedroom drawer. Ray's Chocolate bar is missing and Jay was the last to leave Ray's Room. Jay did not have his chocolate bar yet. Jay ate Ray's chocolate bar.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?