Self-study
Hey! I am looking for a study buddy or study group to stay on track and hold each other accountable.
PT Questions
yuyu78209390
- Joined
- May 2025
- Subscription
- Free
yuyu78209390
Tuesday, Jun 10 2025
yess same! But everyone I have talked to so far just says, since this is mainly on the foundations of the LSAT, we should be focused more on understanding the question and options than the time element. Then, as we get better at understanding how to read the LSAT language, we can start trying to build speed.
yuyu78209390
Tuesday, Jun 10 2025
I don't mean to be condescending of your situation, but in law school and the study of law in general, you're gonna be looking at some pretty triggering cases and data, not to mention, in the LSAT, they showcase similar language comparisons and arguments. I believe that is why they chose to include this question, I don't believe they are actively trying to trigger people.
yuyu78209390
Sunday, Jun 08 2025
So, like a concession, the author is conceding somewhat conceding to a counterargument that can be made.
yuyu78209390
Friday, Jun 06 2025
The first one confused me a bit because it looks like the context needs contexts. It starts off with 'if these new policies" and I asked myself when I was done reading what new policies?
yuyu78209390
Thursday, Jun 05 2025
I got it right in formation, but I had a bit of a brain itch on the second argument. As it says, "tigers are very aggressive and can cause serious injuries to people." Now it's saying tigers "can" cause serious injuries, as in there is still room for an assumption, as you're almost saying they can, but will they? And to me, that's true because it has a level of uncertainty, but it says tigers "are" very aggressive, and so now their being aggressive is definitive. How do we know that for certain? As there are times when they are, in fact, not aggressive.
yuyu78209390
Wednesday, Jun 04 2025
Hey, I am also interested in joining
I am also down