User Avatar
yuyu78209390
Joined
May 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
yuyu78209390
Thursday, Jun 12

I am also down

User Avatar
yuyu78209390
Sunday, Jun 08

So, like a concession, the author is conceding somewhat conceding to a counterargument that can be made.

User Avatar
yuyu78209390
Friday, Jun 06

The first one confused me a bit because it looks like the context needs contexts. It starts off with 'if these new policies" and I asked myself when I was done reading what new policies?

User Avatar
yuyu78209390
Thursday, Jun 05

I got it right in formation, but I had a bit of a brain itch on the second argument. As it says, "tigers are very aggressive and can cause serious injuries to people." Now it's saying tigers "can" cause serious injuries, as in there is still room for an assumption, as you're almost saying they can, but will they? And to me, that's true because it has a level of uncertainty, but it says tigers "are" very aggressive, and so now their being aggressive is definitive. How do we know that for certain? As there are times when they are, in fact, not aggressive.

User Avatar
yuyu78209390
Wednesday, Jun 04

Hey, I am also interested in joining

Confirm action

Are you sure?