Even if they do not mix up experimental questions as @jknauf has proposed, I would be extremely surprised if the LSAC did not account for what experimentals previous test-takers have seen.
As an entity, they put so much time into ensuring that their tests are blind. Remember that they have a record of every test that you took. I would imagine that they account for any section that has previously been seen by a test-taker and would make sure that you don't see it twice if you sit again. I would imagine that they don't use experimentals in tests for a long period of time, too, so that the odds of a repeat are low to begin with.
Comments
No, I think the questions are mashed up from previous experimentals.
Perhaps you could have a question that was on a test as an experimental like 5 years ago lol whole sections aren't copied over though.
I think it is possible. I had a reading comp experimental years ago and the whole section (assuming my memory hasn't failed) appeared on a real PT.
Even if they do not mix up experimental questions as @jknauf has proposed, I would be extremely surprised if the LSAC did not account for what experimentals previous test-takers have seen.
As an entity, they put so much time into ensuring that their tests are blind. Remember that they have a record of every test that you took. I would imagine that they account for any section that has previously been seen by a test-taker and would make sure that you don't see it twice if you sit again. I would imagine that they don't use experimentals in tests for a long period of time, too, so that the odds of a repeat are low to begin with.