I agree with @"Alex Divine". I think the 50's are challenging and make for great timed PTs. I think the 40s would be a nice mix of new material and material that we are not afraid to use up.
@"Daniel.Sieradzki" I totally get your reasoning for why PT 50's make for great timed tests. I myself used them that way and that's why in the original poll I did not include them as an option. But I am a believer in giving people choices and maybe we can have one session where we use two of the 50 PT's for this and the rest can be a mix between 30's and 40's. The majority of them being 40's judging by the vote count. : ) I still need to figure out the details.
@Sami. That makes perfect sense. Ultimately, it should be up to a majority vote. It would be fine to use some 50 PTs if that is what people want. I thought I should just point some stuff out based on my experience. I can't wait for this to start! 7Sage is lucky to have you.
@"Daniel.Sieradzki" said: @Sami. That makes perfect sense. Ultimately, it should be up to a majority vote. It would be fine to use some 50 PTs if that is what people want. I thought I should just point some stuff out based on my experience. I can't wait for this to start! 7Sage is lucky to have you.
I like proportional representation more than majority wins. But that's probably due to my own personal feelings about the voting system lol. So lets see. I can't wait for this to start as well and I am lucky that you get to come to this
@Sami idc which PT you use. I think this is great! There are def patterns. I also think there are patterns in RC. It's just so hard to focus on one thing for so long to reveal these patterns. I'm all in!
@tanes256 said: @Sami idc which PT you use. I think this is great! There are def patterns. I also think there are patterns in RC. It's just so hard to focus on one thing for so long to reveal these patterns. I'm all in!
It definitely takes a bit of work. That's why I am doing it so you don't have to. : )
@"cody.karras" said:
when will this be happening and where?
@"Daniel.Sieradzki" said: @Sami. That makes perfect sense. Ultimately, it should be up to a majority vote. It would be fine to use some 50 PTs if that is what people want. I thought I should just point some stuff out based on my experience. I can't wait for this to start! 7Sage is lucky to have you.
I like proportional representation more than majority wins. But that's probably due to my own personal feelings about the voting system lol. So lets see. I can't wait for this to start as well and I am lucky that you get to come to this
I like your style! If only the presidential election worked the same way!
I'm definitely interested in this! I've been trying to catalog different argument types I've seen cross stimuli to pick up more on trends in how/why certain arguments are more difficult.
I'm very interested! LR despite all of my studying is still kicking my butt. I'm new to this program but I'm taking the LSAT in June. I would like to get my score up another 10 points but I have to take the June LSAT.
@Sami Oh absolutely!! This is great!! I've literally been thinking about this a lot lately, whether or not there were universal strategies that would help identify answer choice or argument patterns. Very interested! Thank you very much!
Will probably start in two to three weeks. So keep a lookout in the announcement.
@rochelleb180 said:
Hi I'd be interested in the 50's but my second choice is 40's. Thanks @nmk_1995 said:
Definitely interested! Count me down as a vote for the PT 50s series
Great : ) . counting your guys' votes.
@Scott_Kissee said:
I'm very interested! LR despite all of my studying is still kicking my butt. I'm new to this program but I'm taking the LSAT in June. I would like to get my score up another 10 points but I have to take the June LSAT.
LR is definitely tough and has a lot going on. I think a 10 point jump is more realistic for September. Have you thought about that?
This is a great idea. Sami our hero. Would love this to be in the 50-59 but I guess patterns are patterns so they should show up in the older tests as well, even if they aren't as wordy as the modern versions.
I want to get feedback and see if there is an interest out their in studying LR but with a focus on strategies that increase your understanding beyond just that PT and question.
Instead of the traditional method where we are just just blind reviewing and trying to understand the question in front of us, we will be focusing on identifying patterns behind each argument so we can carry what we learned over to other LR stimulus in future PT's.
A lot of speed in LR comes from our ability to quickly spot these patterns that are constantly repeating. These patterns are not about learning question types - the core curriculum does a phenomenal job of that - but more about argument types.
So yeah, let me know what you guys think and if you are interested. : )
Update: I am going to let all of you decide what PT series you would like to use to study these patterns.
PT 30-39:
Pros: These are basically drill materials PT's and are considered ideal for burning in order to study. Even the very beginners can join this.
Con: These are older PT's and hence a little less relevant than 40 series. We have also seen a lot of these questions as part of our core curriculum.
PT 40-49
Pros: They are a bit more relevant though I think there is not that much difference as the logic has not changed much from PT 1. I think it's fine to burn these for drills as well since we still have 46 plus fresh PT's left after these.
Cons: Some people still like to use them as fresh PT's.
PT 50-59:
I had a private request for this but since I cannot edit the poll if this series is your preference you can just write this down as a comment below and I would count it in the poll.
Comments
Got it
I vote for the 40s only because the 50+ seem best for full-timed PTs and 1-35, like stated above, are used in the CC and for the problem sets.
I agree with @"Alex Divine". I think the 50's are challenging and make for great timed PTs. I think the 40s would be a nice mix of new material and material that we are not afraid to use up.
I am interested as well
I'd also be interested in the 50s!;)
I'm definitely interested! I'd also like to vote for the 50s PT series, please.
Thank you for doing this, Sami!
Im interested!!!! Thank you!!
Got it : )
@"Daniel.Sieradzki" I totally get your reasoning for why PT 50's make for great timed tests. I myself used them that way and that's why in the original poll I did not include them as an option. But I am a believer in giving people choices and maybe we can have one session where we use two of the 50 PT's for this and the rest can be a mix between 30's and 40's. The majority of them being 40's judging by the vote count. : ) I still need to figure out the details.
when will this be happening and where?
Count me in
@Sami. That makes perfect sense. Ultimately, it should be up to a majority vote. It would be fine to use some 50 PTs if that is what people want. I thought I should just point some stuff out based on my experience. I can't wait for this to start! 7Sage is lucky to have you.
I like proportional representation more than majority wins. But that's probably due to my own personal feelings about the voting system lol. So lets see. I can't wait for this to start as well and I am lucky that you get to come to this
Interested
interested
I am interested in this! How soon will this start?
Yes, I am also interested ! Thank you!!
interested!!
@Sami idc which PT you use. I think this is great! There are def patterns. I also think there are patterns in RC. It's just so hard to focus on one thing for so long to reveal these patterns. I'm all in!
Very interested.
It definitely takes a bit of work. That's why I am doing it so you don't have to. : )
Probably in two or three weeks from now. > @"Bevs ScooterMinion" said:
My pleasure. and I got your vote as well
Definitely interested!!! How can I join the tutoring? I am new to this.
Oh by the way, since I will take the June lsat, I am wondering if we will do this before the exam? Do we have a approximate date for the tutoring?
I like your style! If only the presidential election worked the same way!
Interested as well
I am definitely interested as well!!
Very interested!!!
I'm interested!!
Sounds Awesome
When will this start??
down for this!
Interested
I'm definitely interested in this! I've been trying to catalog different argument types I've seen cross stimuli to pick up more on trends in how/why certain arguments are more difficult.
I'm very interested! LR despite all of my studying is still kicking my butt. I'm new to this program but I'm taking the LSAT in June. I would like to get my score up another 10 points but I have to take the June LSAT.
Interested!
Definitely interested! Count me down as a vote for the PT 50s series
Totally interested!
@Sami Oh absolutely!! This is great!! I've literally been thinking about this a lot lately, whether or not there were universal strategies that would help identify answer choice or argument patterns. Very interested! Thank you very much!
I'm interested!
Hi I'd be interested in the 50's but my second choice is 40's. Thanks
Will probably start in two to three weeks. So keep a lookout in the announcement.
Great : ) . counting your guys' votes.
LR is definitely tough and has a lot going on. I think a 10 point jump is more realistic for September. Have you thought about that?
Interested! Count me in the 30s and 39s.
I'm interested!
This is a great idea. Sami our hero. Would love this to be in the 50-59 but I guess patterns are patterns so they should show up in the older tests as well, even if they aren't as wordy as the modern versions.
I would also be very interested!
I am definitely very interested!
I am interested. Start date? Taking the Sept 2017 LSAT. Thank you!
Very interested!
This would be very helpful! Thank you!